Select committee: Treasury Committee

Conclusion 17

Fifth Report - The Future Framework for Regulation of Financial Services Published 6 Jul 2021 Paragraph 88 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Our Committee has been consistent in its regular monitoring of the work of the Financial Conduct Authority and of the Prudential Regulatory Authority, the extent to which they meet the objectives set for them by Parliament, and their responsiveness to consumer expectations. There is a strong logic in aligning the scrutiny of draft regulations and policy proposals with that of policy implementation and the day-to- day work of the regulators.

From: Treasury Committee, Fifth Report - The Future Framework for Regulation of Financial Services (HC 147), paragraph 88, 6 July 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 20 September 2021 (deadline 6 September 2021).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it is considering the Committee's recommendations alongside the consultation responses and does not intend to respond to each in detail, as that "would pre-judge" a second consultation due in the autumn.

  • The government "agrees with the Committee that the independence of the regulators is vital" and is "committed to preserving the regulators' operational independence".
  • On moving on-shored EU law into regulators' rulebooks, it "notes" the Committee's view and says its proposed approach is that independent regulators set direct requirements within a policy framework set by government and Parliament.
  • It "welcome[s]" the Committee's recommendation of a "targeted approach" to Select Committee scrutiny, and "notes" the Committee's conclusion on a new committee or body, saying structure of scrutiny is "rightly a matter for Parliament".
  • It commits to bring forward "detailed proposals in a second consultation in the autumn".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error