Source · Select Committees · Treasury Committee
Recommendation 12
12
Accepted
We believe that a measure of “ex-ante” scrutiny by Parliament is necessary.
Conclusion
We believe that a measure of “ex-ante” scrutiny by Parliament is necessary. But we do not believe that it would be proportionate for Parliament or its committees to carry out, as a necessary part of the rule-making process, the detailed and comprehensive textual scrutiny which the European Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee conducts. The European Parliament’s legislative processes, under which the existing acquis of EU financial services rules was created, were designed for a parliamentary system which is quite different from that of the UK Parliament. (Paragraph 77) 28 The Future Framework for Regulation of Financial Services
Government response summary AI-generated
The government welcomes the committee's recommendation for a 'targeted approach' to parliamentary scrutiny of regulator activity, agreeing that it is a more appropriate model than detailed textual scrutiny.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government · verbatim extract
Accepted
Third, I welcome the Committee’s recommendation that a ‘targeted approach’ to scrutiny by Select Committees is the appropriate model for Parliamentary scrutiny of regulator activity, whereby the Committee should scrutinise the activities of the regulators in more detail where it considers there is a wider public interest in doing so. As I set out in my evidence session, this is more appropriate than the approach taken by the ECON
Read the full response on Parliament ↗