Select committee: Treasury Committee

Conclusion 25

First Report - Future of financial services regulation Published 16 Jun 2022 Paragraph 175 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
There is a range of innovations taking place in payments systems and with alternative means of exchange, including crypto-assets, stablecoins, and central bank digital currencies. These innovations could provide opportunities to address weaknesses in international payments systems and potentially to serve consumer needs, and in the case of central bank digital currency to safeguard monetary sovereignty. Future of financial services regulation 57 There are challenges associated with innovations in payments, including consumer protection, preventing crime and financial stability. We will be conducting further work on how these challenges are managed.

From: Treasury Committee, First Report - Future of financial services regulation (HC 141), paragraph 175, 16 June 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 7 September 2022 (deadline 16 August 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

HM Treasury "notes" each of the Committee's recommendations, setting out the measures in the Financial Services and Markets Bill and, in places, explaining why it does not take the approach the Committee suggested.

  • On secondary objectives, the government notes the recommendation and says Clause 24 of the FSM Bill implements new secondary objectives for the FCA and PRA on medium to long-term growth and competitiveness, subject to regulators "aligning with relevant international standards".
  • On financial inclusion, it does not consider that a separate 'have regard' for the FCA "would lead to a different approach or tangible improvements over the current arrangements", noting that government already publishes an annual report.
  • On a forward schedule for moving EU files to the rulebooks, it recognises that further information on the programme is important and "expects to set out further information in due course".
  • On Treasury funding of rule reviews, it notes the recommendation and says the Bill requires the Treasury to 'have regard' to minimising the impact of a direction on the regulator's other functions. On CBA panels, it "does not agree" they would impact regulators' independence.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error