Select committee: Treasury Committee

The OBR: 15 years on

Closed Opened 12 Dec 2025 Closed 30 Sep 2026 1 recommendation 2 conclusions
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
The Treasury Committee will examine the Office for Budget Responsiblity's (OBR) current effectiveness and record, and explore whether and how it might need to change. Read the call for evidence to find out more about this inquiry.

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 12 December 2025.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently 4th Report - The Office for Budget Responsibility: Time for change? on 23 September 2026.

The government's response

Government response awaited: deadline 23 November 2026.

Recommendations and conclusions

All 3 recommendations and conclusions

Reports

All reports

Evidence

  • 4 oral evidence sessionsLatest 16 June 2026
  • 12 witnesses
All evidence

Recent activity

Recommendations and conclusions 3 shown

Conclusion 43

Conclusion · 4th Report - The Office for Budget Responsibility: Time for change? · Addressed to HM Treasury

Concluded (the committee's words)
conclusion The Office for Budget Responsibility has attracted criticism and calls for reform when fiscal space is limited. However, economically strained circumstances are the very time when an independent voice within the fiscal framework requires protection rather than castigation. Such calls for reform have apparently been driven by the desire to provide additional spending capacity for successive governments. However, reforming forecasts and forecaster is a poor substitute for developing coherent economic policies and making tough calls, when required.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 44

Recommendation · 4th Report - The Office for Budget Responsibility: Time for change? · Addressed to HM Treasury

Recommended (the committee's words)
conclusion The OBR should continually seek to improve its forecasts and economic modelling, especially by incorporating a new, additional medium-term 10-year forecast. To encourage greater consideration of the overall fiscal position, the Government should provide parliamentary time to debate the Fiscal Risks and Sustainability report. Policymakers though must resist the temptation to blame the messenger when confronted by politically difficult decisions in a fiscally constrained space.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 45

Conclusion · 4th Report - The Office for Budget Responsibility: Time for change? · Addressed to HM Treasury

Concluded (the committee's words)
conclusion Bearing in mind the current economic context, we reject the siren calls for immediate, fundamental reform to the position and independence of the OBR. The potential reform of the OBR must be subject to a high bar, given the risk of undermining both its actual and apparent independence at a time when markets are especially sensitive to levels of government debt. That bar has not been met. 15

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

4 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
16 Jun 2026
Oral evidence
Steve Farrington · HM Treasury, Torsten Bell MP · HM Treasury
View ↗
19 May 2026
Oral evidence
Laura Van Geest · Executive Board of the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM), Professor David Miles CBE · Office for Budget Responsibility, Professor Douglas Elmendorf · Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, Tom Josephs · Office for Budget Responsibility
View ↗
17 Mar 2026
Oral evidence
Dr Lydia Prieg · New Economics Foundation, Julian Jessop · Institute of Economic Affairs, Professor Ben Clift · Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, Ruth Curtice · Resolution Foundation
View ↗
25 Feb 2026
Oral evidence
Richard Hughes · Office for Budget Responsibility, Sir Robert Chote · Northern Ireland Fiscal Council
View ↗

Who gave evidence

12 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Dr Lydia Prieg · Chief Economist New Economics Foundation 1
Julian Jessop · Economics Fellow Institute of Economic Affairs 1
Laura Van Geest · Chair Executive Board of the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) 1
Professor Ben Clift · Professor of Political Economy Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick 1
Professor David Miles CBE · Member, Budget Responsibility Committee Office for Budget Responsibility 1
Professor Douglas Elmendorf · Professor of public policy Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government 1
Richard Hughes · Chair Office for Budget Responsibility 1
Ruth Curtice · Chief Executive Resolution Foundation 1
Sir Robert Chote · Chair Northern Ireland Fiscal Council 1
Steve Farrington · Director of Fiscal Policy HM Treasury 1
Tom Josephs · Member, Budget Responsibility Committee Office for Budget Responsibility 1
Torsten Bell MP · Parliamentary Secretary HM Treasury 1