Select committee inquiry
Capital inquiry
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“The financial crisis revealed that banks were holding insufficient capital relative to the risks they were taking. It also demonstrated that, in the absence of means to re-capitalise failing banks from private sources, the taxpayer would be forced to fund bail-outs of banks which were judged too big to fail. Ensuring that banks could be recapitalised if necessary without recourse to taxpayer funding, is therefore of crucial importance to the UK economy. Parliament has a key role to play in assessing whether the rules and institutions created to achieve this aim are working, or will work, properly. The Treasury Committee examines recovery and resolution in the first stage of its capital inquiry.”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 16 December 2016 to its close on 3 May 2017.
- Correspondence 3 letters
Correspondence 3 letters
- 27 Jan 2017Letter to Philip Hammond MP, Chancellor of the Exchequer, regarding the European Commission prudential reform proposals, dated 27 January 2017From committee
- 27 Jan 2017Letter from Sam Woods, Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation, Bank of England and Chief Executive Officer, Prudential Regulation Authority, regarding proposals to amend EU prudential requirements, dated 19 January 2017To committee
- 19 Dec 2016Letter from Jon Cunliffe, Deputy Governor Financial Stability, Bank of England, dated 7 November 2016To committee