Select committee: Transport Committee

Recommendation 29

3rd Report – Buses connecting communities Published 13 Aug 2025 Addressed to Department for Transport
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The Department should within 18 months develop a dedicated policy and regulatory framework for alternative and complementary public transport models, including Demand-Responsive Transport (DRT) and community transport. This framework should include growing and expanding their role in serving poorly connected places and in connecting passengers to fixed- route public transport networks. The framework should include: 51 • clear guidance on DRT governance and a framework for integration with local transport plans; • guidance on providing socially necessary services through a DRT model; • a review of existing funding streams across departments (such as. home-to-school, health, and social care transport) to identify opportunities for coordination and shared use of DRT services; • optional access to nationally procured digital tools (such as routing software or booking platforms) to support local authorities in designing and managing DRT schemes; • guidance on how both community transport and demand-responsive transport providers should be included in Enhanced Partnerships, to support greater collaboration and ensure inclusive planning; and • the exploration of rural mobility models that prioritise improving access to services, rather than simply replicating traditional public transport, including the role of shared or private car use and lift- sharing schemes as part of a flexible, place-based approach. (Recommendation, Paragraph 111)

From: Transport Committee, 3rd Report – Buses connecting communities (HC 494), 13 August 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 31 October 2025 (deadline 13 October 2025).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government welcomes the Committee's report and responds to each recommendation, agreeing with some in principle, committing to explore or consider others, and declining others, often citing the importance of local decision-making and a challenging fiscal environment.

  • On funding, the Government "agrees with the Committee in principle" on the benefits of multi-year settlements, and "commit[s] to exploring the possibility of a five-year funding settlement for bus services with HMT as part of the next Spending Review".
  • On ring-fencing funding for socially necessary services, it says it "would be challenging to identify an appropriate sum of money to ringfence" and believes service-level decisions should be taken locally.
  • On a free bus pass for under-22s, it "recognises the benefits" but says there is "no funding available for such a scheme" in this Spending Review period, and will use learning from other schemes to inform future Spending Reviews.
  • On a framework for demand-responsive transport, it does not consider that 18 months "would be a realistic timeframe", and says the first version of its best practice guidance is expected "later this year".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error