Select committee: Transport Committee

Recommendation 28

8th Report - Railways Bill Published 10 Feb 2026 Addressed to Department for Transport
Recommendation (the committee's words)
While the Government insists that the intended relationship between clause 60 and clause 63 is clear, multiple stakeholders disagree. The Bill should be amended to make it clear that the capacity duty does not apply until after an infrastructure capacity plan has been developed. (Recommendation, Paragraph 72)

From: Transport Committee, 8th Report - Railways Bill (HC 1472), 10 February 2026

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 24 April 2026 (deadline 10 April 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government welcomes the Committee's report and supports the Bill's main purpose, but on many recommendations it agrees only in part, notes them or disagrees that amending the Bill is needed.

  • On timelines, it agrees with Recommendation 1 and is "happy to commit to publishing a document this Spring" outlining key documents and target dates.
  • On the Long Term Rail Strategy, it partially agrees and disagrees the Bill is the place for more detail, but will publish a discussion document alongside Bill passage through the House of Lords.
  • On the Secretary of State's power of direction (clause 7), it partially agrees but disagrees that amending the Bill is necessary, citing existing precedent and public law.
  • On GBR's licence, it "will aim to publish" a policy document on the draft licence's contents before Commons Report Stage, with full consultation beginning later this year.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error