Security on the railway
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“The purpose of this inquiry was to look at crime and perceptions of crime on the railway and how these can be reduced. Security on the railway - Terms of reference”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
Crime on Britain’s railways decreased year-on-year over the past decade. That trend shows the effectiveness of the specialist rail policing provided by the British Transport Police (BTP). We were impressed by the BTP’s commitment to tackling crime while minimising delays for the travelling public.
Despite the welcome decline in overall crime, we identified areas where the BTP could improve its performance. The British Transport Police Authority (BTPA) is the body with responsibility for setting the BTP challenging but achievable targets to tackle crime on the railway. The BTPA must fulfil its remit and avoid any perception that it is too close to the people whom it should be holding to account.
We concluded that the BTP model of developing specialist policing skills and securing funding from transport providers might usefully be applied to other transport modes, such as aviation. Such an approach could minimise delays, maximise security and reduce the cost of policing to taxpayers.
In the course of our inquiry, we heard that vulnerable children and young people are often found in and around railway stations. We were therefore surprised to learn that the BTP currently has no targets in relation to child protection. The Department for Transport, the BTPA, the BTP and the charity sector should work together to tackle this emerging issue by examining the available data and reviewing current practice.
What the government said
The government responded on 10 November 2014.
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 23 January 2014 to its close on 13 January 2015.
- Oral evidence 2 sessions
- Report 5 Sep 2014
- Government response 10 Nov 2014
What it recommended 0 recommendations · 15 conclusions
1Transport providers pay for specialist railway policing.
2The Secretary of State for Transport must appoint at least one new member of the...
3It is important that the BTP and the BTPA work together effectively, but the BTPA...
4We are satisfied that the BTP should be a DfT responsibility.
5We were convinced by the case for a risk-based approach to policing Britain’s railways.
6The BTP has a proven record of successful risk-based, counter-terrorist policing, which depends on accurate...
7Following the reorganisation of TRANSEC, it is important that the DfT maintains sufficient expertise at...
8There may be value in applying BTP's specialist approach to policing the railways to other...
9We welcome the overall decrease in crime on the railway.
10The DfT, the BTP, Network Rail and train operators must address not only crime, but...
11We approve of the inclusion of compliance with the Secure Stations and Safer Parking schemes...
12Accurate data are crucial to, first, defining and, secondly, solving problems.
13Although the welfare of a runaway young person or child is the long-term responsibility of...
14Child protection at railway stations is an emerging issue.
15We welcome the sharp decline in incidences of cable theft, which has translated into reduced...
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 2
- 23 Jun 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 7 Apr 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗