Select committee inquiry

Maritime strategy

Closed

Transport Committee · Opened 17 June 2013 · Closed 13 January 2015

12 recommendations · 3 conclusions
Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗

What the inquiry looked at

“Further information Report: Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy (PDF 1.84MB) Oral evidence Terms of reference Committee advertises for Specialist Adviser”

The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.

What it found

In the committee's words, from the summary of 13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I ↗

In this report we look at the Government’s recently published strategy for shipping, which has three broad goals:

• to promote the UK as a globally competitive location for shipping which encourages maritime trade; • to build a maritime skills base that supports a vibrant UK maritime sector; and • to ensure that UK shipping is safe, secure and environmentally responsible Our view is that the strategy could provide a sensible framework for Government policy on maritime issues into the next Parliament, but we are not persuaded that the Government can give convincing answers to the strategic questions faced today by the shipping industry. More detailed work is required to ensure that the strategy has long-term significance.

The size of the UK-flagged fleet is directly related to the strength of the broader maritime sector. The fleet grew significantly after 1999 until the recent recession. We recommend that the Government set out what policy measures it will use to ensure that the UK-flagged fleet begins again to grow in size and explain how it will “promote the UK as a global shipping base and centre for maritime services” available to vessels of all nationalities.

The UK supports a number of competing registries of crown dependencies and UK overseas territories in the Red Ensign Group. It is not clear that the benefits to the UK from overseeing the Red Ensign Group outweigh the costs of doing so. We recommend that the Government review the support it provides to the Red Ensign Group, with a view to raising the standards of the vessels which fly under the flag. We also call on the Government to review whether the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) could provide registry support to other flags, as another way of ensuring that the UK provides a global lead in high-quality shipping standards.

In 2011 it was predicted that, within a decade, the UK would have 5,000 fewer deck and engineering officers than the maritime sector would require. If this prediction is borne out, either foreign officers will be recruited to fill the gaps or maritime jobs and businesses will move overseas. We recommend that the Government make an explicit commitment to address fully the predicted shortfall in trained seafarers by 2021. This should involve the Tonnage Tax, SMaRT funding and apprenticeships. We make detailed recommendations about each and about record-keeping.

The MCA is taking on significant new responsibilities in relation to new international environmental and labour agreements at the same time as its budget is being squeezed and while it is carrying a sizeable number of vacancies in key posts. There is as yet no evidence that these factors are undermining the UK’s ability to enforce compliance with international shipping regulations. However, there is a risk that the MCA will increasingly struggle to discharge its regulatory responsibilities, undermining the UK’s status as an influential member of the International Maritime Organization and high-quality flag 4 nation. We recommend that the Government institute an independent review of how the MCA will successfully take on new responsibilities without a proportionate increase in its resources and publish the results of the review in time to inform the next spending review.

We are concerned that senior maritime professionals have suggested that budget cuts are undermining the work of the Marine Accident Investigation Branch. We look to the MAIB’s chief inspector to inform us if budgetary constraints prevent him from adequately discharging his duties.

The MAIB has identified a risk that the crew of wind farm passenger transfer vessels may not always be sufficiently qualified for the work they undertake. This is a significant safety risk to the staff servicing offshore wind farms. We recommend that the Government work with the relevant industry groups to increase the minimum qualifications for the crew of wind farm passenger transfer vessels so that they better reflect the seamanship required for this work. The aim should be to introduce new minimum qualifications by 2016, with voluntary compliance with higher standards before then.

What the government said

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy (Volume II Additional Written Evidence)

No government response is linked to this report.

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

The government responded on 16 June 2014.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response.

The Government welcomes the Committee's support for the Shipping Strategic Partnership, accepts some recommendations with stated actions, and gives reasons for not taking forward others, including an independent review of MCA resources.

  • On the Red Ensign Group, the Government says the registers "can and do bring advantages to the UK" and that it "will therefore continue to retain an effective level of oversight and scrutiny of the REG, with control measures where required".
  • On training, the Government agreed with industry to pilot a tonnage tax change allowing 3 ratings in place of 1 cadet, and says it "will commission updated analysis of the SMarT funding programme" when considering its post-election spending review contributions.
  • It believes an independent review of MCA resources "at this time would be an unnecessary step", citing an existing review of the MCA's survey and inspection capability.
  • On wind farm transfer vessels, it is working to present a final draft of the Brown Code Edition 2 to industry before Seawork in June 2014, and says it "would be counter-productive to introduce wholesale prescriptive changes without proper consultation".

How the inquiry ran

Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 17 June 2013 to its close on 13 January 2015.

  1. Report 2 reports
  2. Government response 16 Jun 2014

What it recommended 12 recommendations · 3 conclusions

1We welcome the publication of the Government’s Shipping Strategic Partnership, which could provide a sensible...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
We welcome the publication of the Government’s Shipping Strategic Partnership, which could provide a sensible framework for Government policy on maritime issues into the next Parliament. We recommend that: • The framework and actions which flow from it be subject to meaningful discussions with both the industry and trade unions; • The framework be sufficiently flexible to accommodate changes in policy and circumstance, including ministerial changes; • Policy should flow from the framework, rather than the framework being used to legitimate a series of disconnected policy announcements; and • Ministers address the clear call from business and unions for a more joined-up approach to maritime policy-making.
2We welcome plans to hold a second London International Shipping Week in 2015 and recommend...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome plans to hold a second London International Shipping Week in 2015 and recommend that the Government ensures that it showcases maritime industries across the UK.
3The growth in the size of the UK-owned and UK-flagged fleets in the decade from...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
The growth in the size of the UK-owned and UK-flagged fleets in the decade from 1999 was a significant achievement which had a substantial, positive economic impact. We welcome the Government’s commitment to continue to “promote the UK flag as the register of choice for high quality ships” but it is not clear what steps are being taken to achieve this. The recent recession halted the growth of the fleet. We recommend that the Government set out what policy measures it will use to ensure that the UK-flagged fleet begins again to grow in size.
4We recommend that Government explain how it will “promote the UK as a global shipping...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that Government explain how it will “promote the UK as a global shipping base and centre for maritime services” available to vessels of all nationalities.
5Given that the UK Government has a stated aim of expanding the UK-flagged fleet as...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
Given that the UK Government has a stated aim of expanding the UK-flagged fleet as “register of choice for high quality ships”, it is surprising to find that it also oversees a number of competing shipping registers. Furthermore, the primary attraction of some of these registers to shipowners is that they offer a lower standard of employment rights than does the UK flag. The Government has acknowledged that growth in some of the registers is linked to the tax haven status of the territories concerned. The Red Ensign Group does not feature in Shipping Strategic Framework 24 and we question whether it contributes to the UK’s shipping strategy. It is not clear that the benefits to the UK from overseeing the Red Ensign Group outweigh the costs of doing so. We recommend that the Government review the support it provides to the Red Ensign Group, with a view to raising the standards of the vessels which fly under the flag.
6We also call on the Government to review whether the MCA could provide registry support...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Concluded (the committee's words)
We also call on the Government to review whether the MCA could provide registry support to other flags, as another way of ensuring that the UK provides a global lead in high-quality shipping standards.
7We recommend that the Government make an explicit commitment to address fully the predicted shortfall...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government make an explicit commitment to address fully the predicted shortfall in trained seafarers by 2021.
8We have sympathy with the argument that the tonnage tax regime should support the training...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
We have sympathy with the argument that the tonnage tax regime should support the training of ratings as well as officers. We look forward to Maritime UK and the trade unions working together to demonstrate that ratings trained in this way would find long-term jobs in the shipping sector. Once this evidence is provided, we recommend that the Government introduce a pilot scheme to demonstrate whether this form of training would be viable.
9We welcome the Government’s decision, announced during London International Shipping Week, to restore SMarT funding...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
We welcome the Government’s decision, announced during London International Shipping Week, to restore SMarT funding to the level it inherited when it came into office. The current Government cannot determine the funding of the scheme beyond 2016 but it can help build consensus about the wider economic value to the UK of supporting the training of seafarers. One way of doing this would be to commission an updated analysis of the value of the scheme, which could contribute to the post- election spending review: we recommend that DfT do so.
10We find it unacceptable that the Skills Funding Agency’s inflexible approach imposed a two-year delay...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
We find it unacceptable that the Skills Funding Agency’s inflexible approach imposed a two-year delay on the introduction of these apprenticeships, which are crucial to maintaining and developing the UK’s maritime work force. We recommend that the Government work with the shipping industry to promote take- up of apprenticeships in order to build the industry’s confidence that apprenticeships are now here to stay.
11We recommend that the Government work with Maritime UK and the Maritime Skills Alliance to...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government work with Maritime UK and the Maritime Skills Alliance to develop statistics showing what proportion of the people recruited as officer cadets stay in the maritime sector. Only by doing so can the Government ensure that its financial commitment to training seafarers represents long-term value for money.
12The Maritime and Coastguard Agency is taking on significant new responsibilities at the same time...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Maritime and Coastguard Agency is taking on significant new responsibilities at the same time as its budget is being squeezed and while it is carrying a sizeable number of vacancies in key posts. There is as yet no evidence that these factors are undermining the UK’s ability to enforce compliance with international shipping 25 regulations. Some of the concerns about the MCA’s performance may be assuaged by increased transparency about its inspection work. However, there is a risk that the MCA will increasingly struggle to discharge its regulatory responsibilities, undermining the UK’s status as an influential member of the International Maritime Organization and high-quality flag nation. We recommend that the Government institute an independent review of how the Maritime and Coastguard Agency will successfully take on new responsibilities without a proportionate increase in its resources and publish the results of the review in time to inform the next spending review.
13We value the work of the MAIB, which we have often found to be extremely...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Concluded (the committee's words)
We value the work of the MAIB, which we have often found to be extremely useful. We are concerned when senior maritime professionals suggest that budget cuts are undermining the work of the organisation. We look to the MAIB’s chief inspector to inform us if budgetary constraints prevent him from adequately discharging his duties.
14There is widespread support for an urgent update of the Code of Practice for Small...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
There is widespread support for an urgent update of the Code of Practice for Small Commercial Workboats, in the wake of the MAIB’s report on the Windcat9 and Island Panther accidents. We recommend that the Government ensure that this revised Code of Practice is promulgated before the summer or explain to us why this is not practicable.
15The MAIB has identified a risk that the crew of passenger transfer vessels may not...

13th Report - Forging ahead?: UK shipping strategy - Volume I

Recommended (the committee's words)
The MAIB has identified a risk that the crew of passenger transfer vessels may not always be sufficiently qualified for the work they undertake. This is a significant safety risk to the staff servicing offshore wind farms. We recommend that the Government work with the relevant industry groups to increase the minimum qualifications for the crew of wind farm passenger transfer vessels so that they better reflect the seamanship required for this work. The aim should be to introduce new minimum qualifications by 2016, with voluntary compliance with higher standards before then.