Select committee inquiry

The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA)

Closed

Transport Committee · Opened 2 November 2012 · Closed 23 October 2013

4 recommendations · 14 conclusions
Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗

What the inquiry looked at

“This inquiry examined the work of VOSA. VOSA is responsible for improving the roadworthiness standards of vehicles through its licensing, testing and enforcement services. Further information: Terms of reference Written evidence Oral evidence”

The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.

What it found

In the committee's words, from the summary of 3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence) ↗

The Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) is responsible for enforcing standards of roadworthiness for heavy goods vehicles (HGV) and public service vehicles (PSV). It does this primarily through licensing and testing. Our report examines how well VOSA is meeting its testing responsibilities; the effectiveness of its enforcement methodology; its relationship with the Traffic Commissioners; and how it will implement the new HGV Road User Levy Act.

Since 2010 VOSA has sought gradually to replace its own testing sites with Authorised Testing Facilities (ATFs) which are run by private sector owners but rely on VOSA’s staff to carry out tests. We have broadly welcomed VOSA’s approach to this transition but have concerns over the pace of change, in particular VOSA’s ability to provide testing staff to new ATFs and how it can ensure smaller operators have access to ATFs, especially in remote areas.

We are not persuaded that testing staff should be employed directly by ATFs. We believe that VOSA’s testing staff are performing well in maintaining high standards of roadworthiness and would not like to see this jeopardised. However we recommend that VOSA works with its trade unions to achieve more flexibility in terms of when testing slots can be provided, particularly in the evenings and at weekends.

VOSA has done well to tackle non-compliance with roadworthiness standards, particularly with regards to non-GB registered vehicles. However we heard evidence that VOSA may be targeting smaller operators who are less frequently on the road instead of larger, more established operators. We recommend that VOSA enhance its targeting methods to ensure it takes a more industry-wide approach to enforcement.

The Department for Transport and VOSA have made efforts to lead on improving road safety standards at European Union level. One of the results of these efforts has been the creation of an EU-wide database of operators’ safety records. In recent months, VOSA has been able to access this information which it can use for enforcement purposes at the roadside. This is particularly useful against offences relating to drivers’ hours which are increasingly of concern. We support these measures and other efforts to strengthen ways to prosecute offenders and see potential for more effective working relationships with the police and other agencies.

We are particularly concerned by VOSA’s relationship with the Traffic Commissioners, despite recent efforts to improve this.

The Traffic Commissioners are responsible for regulating bus services but rely on VOSA staff to monitor vehicle maintenance standards and punctuality. In 2011, VOSA changed its approach to this work by moving away from actively monitoring punctuality towards working with bus operators and local transport authorities on improving policy and processes. The Senior Traffic Commissioner expressed concerns about this change. We also heard that outside London, the only source of reliable data on bus punctuality is held by bus operators but there is often a reluctance to make this available to the Traffic Commissioners. We recommend that, if necessary, the Government should step in to 4 ensure the Traffic Commissioners’have access to this information.

We identified worrying communication problems between the VOSA and the Traffic Commissioners which must be resolved urgently. There has also been slow progress in improving the Traffic Commissioner’s ICT licensing system which both the Traffic Commissioners and industry has found frustrating. In broader terms we have questioned whether the Traffic Commissioners’ reliance on VOSA staff is undermining the Commissioners’ independence. We recommend that the Government consult on the Traffic Commissioners having their own staff independent of VOSA.

The HGV Road User Levy Act provides for the introduction of an HGV road user levy from April 2014. We expect the Government to implement the levy with wider enforcement concerns in mind, for example using it to help better monitor overseas vehicles using UK roads. We have concerns that enforcing the levy will have an impact on VOSA’s other enforcement activities and have asked the Government to examine whether part of the proceeds of the levy could be used to fund its enforcement and provide adequate staff.

What the government said

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume II (Volume II - additional written evidence)

No government response is linked to this report.

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

The government responded on 21 October 2013.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response.

The Government's response describes VOSA as "successfully managing" its testing changes, and sets out where it is acting on, declining or only partly addressing the Committee's recommendations.

  • On testing, VOSA says it "will not cease testing at a government site until sufficient open access capacity is in place for the area", and is meeting operators in the Scottish Isles to tailor options in remote areas.
  • On the Traffic Commissioners, the Government says the functions are subject to periodic review, and the Department "will be considering the delivery options", including a free-standing service.
  • On bus performance data, the Government does not consider that legislating is "appropriate at the current time", as statutory requirements must be balanced against costs to businesses.
  • On licensing IT, the Government says the data sharing Memorandum of Understanding is "already well underway" and it believes this will be agreed "by the end of the year".

How the inquiry ran

Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 2 November 2012 to its close on 23 October 2013.

  1. Report 2 reports
  2. Government response 21 Oct 2013

What it recommended 4 recommendations · 14 conclusions

1We welcome VOSA’s pragmatic approach to maintaining a national network of testing sites and believe...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
We welcome VOSA’s pragmatic approach to maintaining a national network of testing sites and believe that a sensible mix of VOSA sites and ATFs is the best way to maintain even coverage across the country. We recommend that VOSA provide us with further information about how it is working with operators to ensure even coverage of testing sites across the country. We would also like to know how VOSA will ensure that a sufficient number of testing sites remain open to third party operators, particularly in remote areas.
2While we acknowledge a fully privatised model might be of benefit to some operators, we...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
While we acknowledge a fully privatised model might be of benefit to some operators, we are not convinced that the case has been made for testing staff to be employed directly by ATFs. The UK’s HGVs and PSV road safety record is testament to the high standards of VOSA’s testing staff and we would not like to see this undermined in any way. This places an obligation on VOSA to provide staff at the right places at the right times for the industry.
3VOSA is committed to allowing more ATFs to open but the impact on VOSA’s resources...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
VOSA is committed to allowing more ATFs to open but the impact on VOSA’s resources need greater consideration to ensure that confidence in ATFs is maintained.
4VOSA should conduct market research to investigate claims that operators are suffering long time delays...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
VOSA should conduct market research to investigate claims that operators are suffering long time delays or long distances when booking tests. The results should be fed into deciding the pace at which ATFs may be opened.
5VOSA should be more flexible in when it can offer testing slots.

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
VOSA should be more flexible in when it can offer testing slots. It should work with hauliers to assess the demand for more night-time and weekend working and explore with its unions how to achieve this.
6VOSA has done well to reduce its deficit in recent years without placing additional burdens...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
VOSA has done well to reduce its deficit in recent years without placing additional burdens on operators. While we acknowledge the case for a fee increase intended to at least maintain current service levels, during a period of slow growth VOSA should be mindful of the impact of its fees on operators.
7We recognise the value of the Operators Compliance Risk Score for targeting dangerous vehicles while...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
We recognise the value of the Operators Compliance Risk Score for targeting dangerous vehicles while minimising the burden on the compliant. However we are concerned that undue reliance on the OCRS could have a distorting effect whereby larger operators are not being monitored effectively. This could encourage complacency or poor practice. VOSA should enhance OCRS to remove this distortion.
8We support legislative changes that will enable drivers to be prosecuted when they have committed...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
We support legislative changes that will enable drivers to be prosecuted when they have committed tachograph offences whenever they are discovered.
9VOSA has begun to improve its links with other agencies.

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
VOSA has begun to improve its links with other agencies. However, we believe that there is scope for it to take a more consistent approach to working with the police and the Traffic Commissioners to ensure offenders are prosecuted appropriately. We recommend that VOSA publish and consult on a new strategy for improving its links with other agencies in order to ensure that a consistent line is taken by VOSA, the police and other relevant bodies on the prosecution of HGV drivers and operators.
10The Department for Transport must ensure that VOSA is supporting the crucial work of the...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Department for Transport must ensure that VOSA is supporting the crucial work of the Traffic Commissioners in prioritising its own work. We recommend that DfT explain more fully how the Compliance Forum is used to determine VOSA’s enforcement strategy and demonstrate how the Traffic Commissioners are able to influence that strategy.
11Wherever possible, performance related data held by bus operators should be made available to the...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
Wherever possible, performance related data held by bus operators should be made available to the Traffic Commissioners. If necessary the Department for Transport should consider legislation to facilitate this.
12We see real value in the proposals to improve VOSA’s and the Traffic Commissioner’s ICT...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
We see real value in the proposals to improve VOSA’s and the Traffic Commissioner’s ICT systems. We also acknowledge the difficulties involved in any radical overhaul in ICT – particularly in a time of shrinking budgets. Nevertheless ICT improvements have the potential to save money in the long term and so should be seen as an investment. The business case for these improvements should be assessed in light of customer expectations. It is now the norm for administrative functions of this kind to be online, easily accessible and instant.
13The Traffic Commissioners should not be using an outdated IT system to process operator licences...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Traffic Commissioners should not be using an outdated IT system to process operator licences and a data sharing agreement between VOSA and the Office of the Traffic Commissioners is long overdue. The Minister needs to use his influence to speed up negotiations so that progress can be made in these areas within the next year.
14When asked about the Senior Traffic Commissioner’s concerns about the independence of her office we...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
When asked about the Senior Traffic Commissioner’s concerns about the independence of her office we were pleased that the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State said that he would “look tomorrow at what might be done”. The Minister should tell us about the results of his investigation in the Government’s response to this report.
15During this inquiry, there was a worrying conflict between evidence from the Senior Traffic Commissioner...

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
During this inquiry, there was a worrying conflict between evidence from the Senior Traffic Commissioner and that from VOSA’s Chief Executive and the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport. On a number of occasions the Senior Traffic Commissioner said she had raised issues with VOSA and the Department for Transport only for them to say they had not heard the concerns before. There are clearly significant communication problems which urgently need resolving.
16The Traffic Commissioner’s reliance on VOSA staff is problematic.

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Traffic Commissioner’s reliance on VOSA staff is problematic. We accept that the July 2012 Framework Document has done much to clarify the relationship between VOSA and the Traffic Commissioners in recent years but it is apparent that more needs to be done. VOSA’s Chief Executive said the relationship between VOSA and the Traffic Commissioners “has not always been a marriage made in heaven” while the Senior Traffic Commissioner said “We are trying very hard to make it work”. We believe these problems are not going to go away by themselves. The Department for Transport should consult on whether now is the time for the Traffic Commissioners to have their own staff independent of VOSA.
17The levy’s impact on VOSA’s resources could make its enforcement more difficult.

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
The levy’s impact on VOSA’s resources could make its enforcement more difficult. The Government should consider redirecting some of the levy’s proceeds from the Consolidated Fund into the Single Enforcement Budget. We would like to hear the Government’s assessment of this and whether more revenue would be raised from stronger enforcement.
18The HGV Road User Levy database should be implemented with wider enforcement issues in mind.

3rd Report - The work of the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
The HGV Road User Levy database should be implemented with wider enforcement issues in mind. VOSA has said that it has been involved in setting up the levy scheme. VOSA should be encouraging the system’s design to complement its other enforcement responsibilities, specifically relating to non-GB vehicles.