Select committee inquiry

Coastguard Service

Closed

Transport Committee · Opened 19 July 2012 · Closed 31 December 2012

Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗

What the inquiry looked at

“Further information: Oral evidence Coastguard, Emergency Towing Vessels and the Maritime Incident Response Group: follow up: Government Response to the Committee's Sixth Report of 2012-13 Terms of reference Coastguards, Emergency Towing Vessels and the Maritime Incident Response Group inquiry page Letter from Stephen Hammond MP to Loiuse Ellman MP responding to questions on the modernisation of HM Coastguard and BP-chartered vessel, Grampian Frontier dated 25 March 2013”

The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.

What it found

In the committee's words, from the summary of 6th Report - The Coastguard, Emergency Towing Vessels and the Maritime Incident Response Group: follow up - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence) ↗

We published a critical report on the Government’s proposals to modernise the Coastguard Service in June 2011. Revised modernisation proposals were published in November 2011 and are now being implemented. In this report we review issues raised by implementation.

There is a surprising degree of consensus that the Coastguard Service has to be reformed, with fewer coordination centres and greater resilience and greater inter-operability.

However, we have a number of significant concerns about implementation of the current proposals:

• it is unclear what role the new national Maritime Operations Centre (MOC) will play in relation to the work currently undertaken by Maritime Response Coordination Centres (MRCCs)

• the vacancy rate in the Coastguard Service has doubled in two years • there have been mixed messages about the timing of station closures • there is a clear risk that local knowledge will be lost; the Maritime and Coastguard Agency’s stance in respect of the local knowledge it expects coastguards to have is confusing and contradictory • issues remain with communication links, particularly in relation to Shetland MRCC.

Morale is low in the Coastguard Service and there is a risk that talent and expertise is being lost. We call on the Government to set out its strategy for retaining experienced coastguards, particularly in terms of recruitment to positions based at the MOC.

Our report also follows up scrutiny of the Government’s decisions not to renew the contract for emergency towing vessels (ETVs) and not to fund a nautical fire-fighting initiative, the Maritime Incident Response Group.

What the government said

6th Report - The Coastguard, Emergency Towing Vessels and the Maritime Incident Response Group: follow up - Volume II (Volume II: additional written evidence)

No government response is linked to this report.

6th Report - The Coastguard, Emergency Towing Vessels and the Maritime Incident Response Group: follow up - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

No government response is linked to this report.

How the inquiry ran

Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 19 July 2012 to 14 October 2013.

  1. Report 2 reports
  2. Correspondence 14 Oct 2013

What it recommended

The committee's recommendations are not listed here yet. Read them in 6th Report - The Coastguard, Emergency Towing Vessels and the Maritime Incident Response Group: follow up - Volume II (Volume II: additional written evidence) ↗ and 6th Report - The Coastguard, Emergency Towing Vessels and the Maritime Incident Response Group: follow up - Volume I (Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence) ↗ on parliament.uk.

Correspondence 1 letter