Select committee inquiry

Road Safety

Closed

Transport Committee · Opened 13 September 2011 · Closed 19 July 2012

17 recommendations · 3 conclusions
Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗

What the inquiry looked at

“The Transport Committee undertook an inquiry into the Government’s strategic framework for road safety, which was published in May 2011. The Government’s vision for road safety is to ensure that Britain remains a world leader on road safety and that the relatively high risk of accidents amongst some groups, such as cyclists and children from deprived areas, is quickly reduced. The Committee will examine whether the strategic framework will fulfil this vision. Further information: Letter from Stephen Hammond MP to Louise Ellman MP dated 20 March 2013 Report: Volume I (PDF version) Volume II (PDF version) Government Response (PDF version) Terms of Reference Oral evidence”

The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.

What it found

In the committee's words, from the summary of 2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence) ↗

In 2011, 1,901 people were killed in road accidents. This is the first annual increase in road fatalities since 2003 and a 3% increase compared to 2010. 25,023 people were killed or seriously injured, an increase of 2% from 2010 and the first annual increase since 1994.

The number of people killed or seriously injured remains lower than any year since national records began, except for 2010. However, any increase in road deaths is cause for concern. We think that the Government should provide an explanation for these increases and reassurance that this does not mark the beginning of a worrying trend in road deaths.

The Government published its Strategic Framework for Road Safety in May 2011. In a departure from previous approaches to road safety, the Government has decided not to include the use of targets in its road safety strategy. Targets have been replaced with an action plan and outcomes framework, which consist of a number of indicators which will be measured, and a set of casualty forecasts. According to these forecasts, we should expect casualties to fall by 37% by 2020 (compared to the 2005-09 average). Defined targets to reduce road casualties have been an important contributor to improvements in road safety.

We heard that targets help focus attention on road safety and prioritise resources. Yet they are not the only factor driving road safety improvements that we have heard about. Our evidence suggests that the principal factor in improving road safety is political leadership.

For some, the presence of targets was a sign of this leadership. If the Government is not going to adopt this approach, then it should be making more effort to provide leadership in other ways.

Localism is a key theme of the Government’s strategy. It believes decentralising power and funding will allow local authorities to be more flexible and innovative in tackling road safety. We have found considerable variation amongst local authorities in their performance on road safety. Whilst there are examples of good practice, there are cases in which local authorities have not improved their road safety performance in recent years at all. We welcome the forthcoming guidance for local authorities on best practice in road safety, but simply providing guidance limits the Department for Transport to a passive role. Under conditions of reduced local authority resources and loss of skilled road safety personnel, the Government should not sit back and expect road safety to remain a priority.

Stronger leadership and a clearer vision are required from Government to communicate the importance of road safety to local decision makers.

We have found particular issues in casualty rates for young drivers and cyclists. Road accidents are the leading cause of death for young people aged 16-24. Despite assurances that the issue of young driver road safety is a priority, we are not convinced that this is reflected in the road safety strategy. There are a variety of proposals which may help improve young driver road safety. The Government should review these and incorporate a targeted strategy to address young driver road safety into the Strategic Framework.

Cycling casualty reductions are highlighted in the Government’s vision for road safety. In 2011, 3,085 cyclists were killed or seriously injured. We heard about a number of different ways to improve cycle safety, including training, fitting HGVs with sensors and providing infrastructure. This issue was brought to particular prominence by The Times cycle 4 campaign, which we commend. We have heard expressions of support from Government for this campaign, which we would now like to see translated into action.

The planned update of the Strategic Framework for Road Safety in September 2012 is an opportunity for the Government to reassess its road safety strategy. In particular, given recent road fatality increases, it should update progress against its action plan and outcomes framework. We would like to see the inclusion of plans, outlined to us by the department, to name and shame local authorities that are under-performing on road safety, greater detail on the role of engineering to improve road safety and an outline of the Department for Transport’s efforts to provide leadership by joining up road safety work across Whitehall.

What the government said

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume II (Additional written evidence)

No government response is linked to this report.

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

The government responded on 26 October 2012.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response.

The government welcomes the Committee's report and responds to its recommendations in turn, agreeing in some areas and declining others, including an independent review of driver training and mandatory HGV proximity sensors.

  • On local performance data, it "agrees that it has a role to play in sharing information on local authority performance and best practice", and says the Road Safety Observatory "will be launched before the end of this year".
  • On young drivers, it "does not believe that an independent review of driver training would be appropriate", and "intends to announce further proposals" before the end of this year.
  • On cycle safety, it supports voluntary fitment of sensors but "at this time we are not in a position to support mandatory fitment of proximity sensors in HGVs", saying any mandate would need to be agreed at EU level.
  • On the motorcycle test, a full public consultation will follow the research trials and, "subject to the outcome of the consultation", a new test "could be introduced in April 2014".

How the inquiry ran

Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 13 September 2011 to 26 October 2012.

  1. Report 2 reports
  2. Government response 26 Oct 2012

What it recommended 17 recommendations · 3 conclusions

1The Department should provide a clearer explanation of the role of casualty forecasts in its...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Department should provide a clearer explanation of the role of casualty forecasts in its road safety strategy. We recommend that it set out in its annual report whether road safety is improving each year in line with its forecasts, or, if not, explain what is going wrong. The Government should also state what action it will take if its road safety forecasts turn out to be inaccurate.
2As part of its evaluation of the Strategic Framework for Road Safety, the Government should...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
As part of its evaluation of the Strategic Framework for Road Safety, the Government should publish an analysis of the resources used for road safety at a local level to highlight best practice by local authorities, in particular noting innovative practices and multi-agency approaches to achieving road safety goals.
3The Government should explain how it intends to measure which are the worst performing local...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should explain how it intends to measure which are the worst performing local authorities and how it expects “naming and shaming” them will improve their performance.
4We recommend that the Department provides an update of the initial findings of the Learning...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Department provides an update of the initial findings of the Learning to Drive programme with its response to this report.
5We recommend that the Government initiate an independent review of driver training to assess thoroughly...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government initiate an independent review of driver training to assess thoroughly the various options put forward to reduce the casualty rate for young drivers and make recommendations about which are likely to be most effective. We recommend this review be completed before the end of this Parliament.
6The Government should consider how to encourage greater adoption of these measures.

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should consider how to encourage greater adoption of these measures.
7We agree that joint working between departments will be necessary to achieve road safety outcomes.

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
We agree that joint working between departments will be necessary to achieve road safety outcomes. We recommend that the Government shows how its efforts to work in partnership with departments such as DCLG and local authorities have been effective in encouraging the provision of cycle infrastructure and outlines which problems in securing this joint-working have yet to be overcome.
8Given the Prime Minister’s support for The Times cycle campaign, we recommend that the department...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
Given the Prime Minister’s support for The Times cycle campaign, we recommend that the department issue a formal response to each of its eight points showing how 34 they are being addressed and, if a point is not being acted on, what alternative action is being taken to address the matter.
9Prior to The Times campaign on cycle safety it was difficult to see how the...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
Prior to The Times campaign on cycle safety it was difficult to see how the Government was showing leadership in cycle safety. There is now evidence of commitment, but, as Jon Snow said, leadership requires joining up Government. We are not convinced that this is happening and therefore there is much work still to be done.
10We recommend that the DfT should, in its reply to this report, explain what lessons...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the DfT should, in its reply to this report, explain what lessons it has learnt from [the delay to revising the motorcycle test] and how it will go about implementing future European directives on the subject of driver or rider training without undue delay.
11We recommend that the department write to us on a quarterly basis to explain progress...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the department write to us on a quarterly basis to explain progress in this area.
12The Government should encourage the development of inter-agency partnerships and include examples of best practice...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should encourage the development of inter-agency partnerships and include examples of best practice in securing joint working in its forthcoming guidance for local authorities.
13We recommend that as part of its consultation the Government calculates the costs associated with...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that as part of its consultation the Government calculates the costs associated with stricter enforcement of an 80 mph limit and creating more variable speed limits on sections of the motorway network deemed inappropriate to see an increase to 80 mph.
14The possibility of increasing the motorway speed limit has been discussed since September 2011, it...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
The possibility of increasing the motorway speed limit has been discussed since September 2011, it is now time for the DfT to publish its consultation document or to explain the reason for delay.
15The Government should ensure that any decision to increase the speed limit should follow a...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should ensure that any decision to increase the speed limit should follow a debate in the House on a votable motion.
16We recommend that the Government includes engineering measures in its outcomes framework, for example by...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government includes engineering measures in its outcomes framework, for example by providing EuroRAP assessments of road safety.
17We recommend that the Government provides an update on progress in those areas which it...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government provides an update on progress in those areas which it committed to developing at an EU level in the last road safety strategy and sets out forthcoming areas for prioritisation.
18The period since the Coalition Government took office has seen the first increase in road...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
The period since the Coalition Government took office has seen the first increase in road fatalities since 2003, despite there having been no overall increase in road traffic. This is a worrying development and raises questions about the Government’s road safety strategy. These casualty figures should be a wake-up call for the Government to step up and provide stronger leadership in the road safety field. The Minister, Mike Penning MP, told us that success of his strategy could be judged by seeing a reduction in road casualties. From the latest figures, it would appear there is a risk that the strategy is insufficient. In the response to this report, we recommend that the Government outlines why it thinks road deaths increased in 2011.
19The Government should update us regarding the development of new advertising campaigns for road safety,...

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should update us regarding the development of new advertising campaigns for road safety, particularly on how it intends to engage with social media to help improve public awareness.
20A year has now passed since the publication of the Strategic Framework for Road Safety.

2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)

Concluded (the committee's words)
A year has now passed since the publication of the Strategic Framework for Road Safety. The next version is due in September 2012. This provides an opportunity to include a number of areas insufficiently addressed in the original strategy - including engineering measures to improve road design and technological research. It is also an opportune time for the Government to publish an update of its progress against the action plan and outcomes framework, to clarify its vision, highlight areas of local authority innovation or best practice, and reassess the strategy in light of recent worrying casualty numbers.