Road Safety
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“The Transport Committee undertook an inquiry into the Government’s strategic framework for road safety, which was published in May 2011. The Government’s vision for road safety is to ensure that Britain remains a world leader on road safety and that the relatively high risk of accidents amongst some groups, such as cyclists and children from deprived areas, is quickly reduced. The Committee will examine whether the strategic framework will fulfil this vision. Further information: Letter from Stephen Hammond MP to Louise Ellman MP dated 20 March 2013 Report: Volume I (PDF version) Volume II (PDF version) Government Response (PDF version) Terms of Reference Oral evidence”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
In 2011, 1,901 people were killed in road accidents. This is the first annual increase in road fatalities since 2003 and a 3% increase compared to 2010. 25,023 people were killed or seriously injured, an increase of 2% from 2010 and the first annual increase since 1994.
The number of people killed or seriously injured remains lower than any year since national records began, except for 2010. However, any increase in road deaths is cause for concern. We think that the Government should provide an explanation for these increases and reassurance that this does not mark the beginning of a worrying trend in road deaths.
The Government published its Strategic Framework for Road Safety in May 2011. In a departure from previous approaches to road safety, the Government has decided not to include the use of targets in its road safety strategy. Targets have been replaced with an action plan and outcomes framework, which consist of a number of indicators which will be measured, and a set of casualty forecasts. According to these forecasts, we should expect casualties to fall by 37% by 2020 (compared to the 2005-09 average). Defined targets to reduce road casualties have been an important contributor to improvements in road safety.
We heard that targets help focus attention on road safety and prioritise resources. Yet they are not the only factor driving road safety improvements that we have heard about. Our evidence suggests that the principal factor in improving road safety is political leadership.
For some, the presence of targets was a sign of this leadership. If the Government is not going to adopt this approach, then it should be making more effort to provide leadership in other ways.
Localism is a key theme of the Government’s strategy. It believes decentralising power and funding will allow local authorities to be more flexible and innovative in tackling road safety. We have found considerable variation amongst local authorities in their performance on road safety. Whilst there are examples of good practice, there are cases in which local authorities have not improved their road safety performance in recent years at all. We welcome the forthcoming guidance for local authorities on best practice in road safety, but simply providing guidance limits the Department for Transport to a passive role. Under conditions of reduced local authority resources and loss of skilled road safety personnel, the Government should not sit back and expect road safety to remain a priority.
Stronger leadership and a clearer vision are required from Government to communicate the importance of road safety to local decision makers.
We have found particular issues in casualty rates for young drivers and cyclists. Road accidents are the leading cause of death for young people aged 16-24. Despite assurances that the issue of young driver road safety is a priority, we are not convinced that this is reflected in the road safety strategy. There are a variety of proposals which may help improve young driver road safety. The Government should review these and incorporate a targeted strategy to address young driver road safety into the Strategic Framework.
Cycling casualty reductions are highlighted in the Government’s vision for road safety. In 2011, 3,085 cyclists were killed or seriously injured. We heard about a number of different ways to improve cycle safety, including training, fitting HGVs with sensors and providing infrastructure. This issue was brought to particular prominence by The Times cycle 4 campaign, which we commend. We have heard expressions of support from Government for this campaign, which we would now like to see translated into action.
The planned update of the Strategic Framework for Road Safety in September 2012 is an opportunity for the Government to reassess its road safety strategy. In particular, given recent road fatality increases, it should update progress against its action plan and outcomes framework. We would like to see the inclusion of plans, outlined to us by the department, to name and shame local authorities that are under-performing on road safety, greater detail on the role of engineering to improve road safety and an outline of the Department for Transport’s efforts to provide leadership by joining up road safety work across Whitehall.
What the government said
2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume II (Additional written evidence)
No government response is linked to this report.
2nd Report - Road Safety - Volume I (Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence)
The government responded on 26 October 2012.
The government welcomes the Committee's report and responds to its recommendations in turn, agreeing in some areas and declining others, including an independent review of driver training and mandatory HGV proximity sensors.
- On local performance data, it "agrees that it has a role to play in sharing information on local authority performance and best practice", and says the Road Safety Observatory "will be launched before the end of this year".
- On young drivers, it "does not believe that an independent review of driver training would be appropriate", and "intends to announce further proposals" before the end of this year.
- On cycle safety, it supports voluntary fitment of sensors but "at this time we are not in a position to support mandatory fitment of proximity sensors in HGVs", saying any mandate would need to be agreed at EU level.
- On the motorcycle test, a full public consultation will follow the research trials and, "subject to the outcome of the consultation", a new test "could be introduced in April 2014".
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 13 September 2011 to 26 October 2012.
- Report 2 reports
- Government response 26 Oct 2012