Select committee: Scottish Affairs Committee

Conclusion 3

First Report - Defence in Scotland: military landscape Published 24 Jun 2022 Paragraph 21 Addressed to Scotland Office
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We note that the 2014 commitment to increase the number of Regular Armed Forces personnel has been superseded by changing strategic priorities. We welcome the 2021 Future Soldier programme to increase the number of battalions in Scotland and that Scotland will host a greater proportion of the Army in the future.

From: Scottish Affairs Committee, First Report - Defence in Scotland: military landscape (HC 82), paragraph 21, 24 June 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 26 September 2022.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's recognition of defence investment in Scotland, rejects the claim of 'engrained hesitancy' towards Scottish SMEs, and mostly notes or commits to continue existing work on the other recommendations.

  • On SMEs, the MOD says it "reject[s]" the view that there is an "engrained hesitancy" in the defence sector towards Scottish SMEs. It notes the recommendation to reach 8% of SME spending in Scotland, and points instead to its UK-wide target that 25% of procurement spend goes directly and indirectly to SMEs by the end of 2022.
  • On warship procurement, it says the build location of specific vessels "cannot be guaranteed" and that each class of ship will be determined "on a case-by-case basis".
  • On local authority collaboration, it notes the recommendations and says it will continue to work with local authorities. It states that "Local economic assessments are not routinely conducted", and is committed to formal partnership arrangements "where appropriate".
  • On the recommendations to the Scottish Government about funding and income tax, it says the matters sit outside the MOD's remit and that officials have been asked to share them with Scottish Government counterparts.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error