E-crime
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“The Home Affairs Committee's inquiry into e-crime.”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What the government said
5th Report - E-crime - Volume II (Volume II: additional written evidence)
No government response is linked to this report.
5th Report - E-crime - Volume I
The government responded on 21 October 2013.
The Government responds to the Home Affairs Committee's E-crime report by accepting or supporting many recommendations, while not accepting others, including those on low-level fraud reporting, Europol funding and sentencing.
- On recording, it accepts recommendation 24. A 'cyber flag' is running on a voluntary basis only during 2013/14 and will be "subject to wider consultation" on whether it becomes mandatory for 2014/15.
- It does not accept conclusion 25 on the "black hole" in low-level fraud, saying linked reports analysed by the NFIB can reveal high-volume, low-value frauds. It is working with industry to encourage reporting of all low-level fraud.
- It accepts recommendation 11 and "will set up an external working group" led by the Home Office to improve estimates of the cost of cyber crime. No date is given.
- It rejects recommendation 15 on sentencing, stating that sentencing guidelines are "a matter for the independent Sentencing Council". It "does not, at this time, support" a mandatory code of conduct for removing online material, but will keep the matter under consideration.
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 13 April 2012 to 21 October 2013.
- Report 2 reports
- Government response 21 Oct 2013
What it recommended
The committee's recommendations are not listed here yet. Read them in 5th Report - E-crime - Volume II (Volume II: additional written evidence) ↗ and 5th Report - E-crime - Volume I ↗ on parliament.uk.