Select committee: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

Recommendation 5

Ninth Report - Civil Service People Survey Published 24 Oct 2023 Paragraph 23
Recommendation (the committee's words)
It is not clear what value the Employee Engagement Index offers, beyond consistency with previous years’ results. In drawing together responses on abstract questions on issues such as pride, advocacy, and attachment, it overlooks more tangible issues such as leadership, learning and development, and pay and benefits, where action could usefully be taken.

From: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Ninth Report - Civil Service People Survey (HC 575), paragraph 23, 24 October 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 18 January 2024 (deadline 18 January 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Cabinet Office accepts several of the Committee's recommendations on the Civil Service People Survey, but does not accept those on earlier publication of initial results or on classifying the survey as official statistics.

  • On engagement with users, it "accepts this recommendation" and will consider wider engagement of external stakeholders, with a list of consultees to be included in future technical guides on GOV.UK.
  • On the Employee Engagement Index, it accepts the recommendation and will "explore the content and usefulness" of the Index, planning changes over the next two years towards a new version of the Survey in 2025.
  • It does not accept the recommendations on publishing results when distributed to participants or on treating the survey as official statistics, describing it as "primarily a management tool". It commits to publishing a commentary and reducing the time between internal and external distribution.
  • On action plans, the Government "disagrees with the overall statement that effective action is not taken" from the Survey, recognises the benefits of action plans, and accepts the recommendation to enhance support, while balancing central guidance with departmental autonomy.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error