Source · Select Committees · Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Recommendation 10
10
Accepted
Paragraph: 62
Absence of data prioritisation framework causes significant evidence gaps across government.
Conclusion
Currently, the UK has no framework by which to identify, and then prioritise, demands for data and evidence. In the absence of such a framework, and with an ongoing need to have regard to budget constraints, Ministers and HM Treasury wield an inordinate amount of power in deciding what evidence the UK collects and communicates through the decisions they take on departmental budgets. In the context of these systemic shortcomings, significant data gaps have emerged; the UK lacks suitable evidence on the performance of its different health services, for example, and on key policy challenges like school absenteeism.
Government Response Summary
The Analytical Function Central Team (AFCT) will work with HM Treasury to assess the best option for future funding for a dedicated central AF team. Additionally, the Head of the AF will work with Chief Analysts across government to raise the Function's profile.
Paragraph Reference:
62
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government
Accepted
30. The ONS remains committed to the Analysis Function (AF), and as such accepts the principle of this recommendation and is grateful for the Committee’s concern about its future funding model. 31. We believe that funding for a dedicated central AF team is essential to ensure that analysts across the Civil Service have the support they need to deliver better outcomes for the public by providing the best analysis to inform decision making. 32. Therefore, the AF Central Team (AFCT) will work with HM Treasury to assess the best option for future funding. As Head of the AF, I will work with Chief Analysts across government to ensure the profile of the Function continues to be raised.