Select committee: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Conclusion 4
Third Report - Propriety of Governance in Light of Greensill: An Interim Report
Published 22 Jul 2021
Paragraph 22
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Propriety of governance in light of Greensill All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We are at a loss to explain Mr Gove’s decision not to allow Ms Gray to give evidence to the Committee, particularly given her willingness to do so. The Osmotherly Rules have never been recognised by Parliament, which maintains its right to call for any individual. However, even if Parliament were to accept the Rules, we can see no grounds within them for Ms Gray not to give evidence to our inquiry. As we made clear, the nature of the questions we wished to put to Ms Gray was to establish matters of fact. The Minister has denied Ms Gray the opportunity to give her version of events and to clarify her role. Moreover, the intervention of the Minister to prevent her from answering these will surely add to the suspicions surrounding this episode.
From: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Third Report - Propriety of Governance in Light of Greensill: An Interim Report (HC 59), paragraph 22, 22 July 2021
Government response
No government response is linked to this report.