Source · Select Committees · Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Recommendation 50
50
Regardless of the benefits or disadvantages of the changes made by the Bill to the...
Conclusion
Regardless of the benefits or disadvantages of the changes made by the Bill to the electoral system for those offices, the manner in which the proposed legislative change was brought about is unsatisfactory. Making changes such as this after the Bill has been introduced and debated at Second Reading is disrespectful to the House. (Paragraph 232) 72 The Elections Bill
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
The Government disagrees with the Committee’s recommendation in paragraph 193. The public rightly expects effective and independent regulation of the electoral system. The Electoral Commission has a vital role to play in upholding the integrity of free and fair elections and public confidence in that integrity. As the independent regulatory body charged with such pivotal responsibilities, the Commission should be fully accountable to Parliament for the way it discharges its functions. In recent years, some across the House have lost confidence in the work of the Commission and have questioned the adequacy of the existing accountability structures. We must reflect on the current structures charged with this important responsibility, enhance good practice and, where there is a need for change, be prepared to make it. The Government’s proposals are necessary and represent a proportionate approach to reforming the accountability of the Electoral Commission whilst respecting its independence.