Source · Select Committees · Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Recommendation 3
3
Paragraph: 23
Whilst a number of the proposed measures have been widely supported, including on undue influence,...
Conclusion
Whilst a number of the proposed measures have been widely supported, including on undue influence, the Government’s decision to focus on several ‘standalone’ reforms shows a lack of ambition. It has missed the only opportunity to bring forward a Bill which simplifies and consolidates electoral law, as has been recommended by the Law Commissions, our predecessor Committee and the CSPL. Such a Bill is likely to have received cross-party support, but most importantly, is required to make electoral law easier to understand and comply with - thereby supporting public confidence in elections.
Paragraph Reference:
23
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
Electoral law is complex but understood by those who administer elections and referendums. It is robust and we can, as we have in the past, rely on it and our electoral administrators to underpin free and fair elections and have confidence in their results. That is not to say that the legislation cannot be and should not be revised and improved. Undoubtedly the rules that govern our electoral landscape are numerous and have evolved over time, and the Government agrees in principle that electoral law would benefit from consolidation. We remain committed to ensuring that our electoral law is fit for purpose, now and into the future. We also acknowledge that the process of consolidating electoral law will be a long-term project that will take significant consideration and policy development and is not something to rush. The Government’s immediate priority is to deliver on its manifesto pledges, and to strengthen electoral integrity to stop the real risks of electoral fraud – as seen in Tower Hamlets in 2014–15.