Select committee: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

Recommendation 23

Seventh Report - The Role of Non-Executive Directors in Government Published 20 Jun 2023
Recommendation (the committee's words)
In chapter two in this Report, we recommend that the Government publishes an updated Corporate Governance Code and terms of reference for each departmental board to provide greater transparency on the individual responsibilities of NEDs. In addition to this, we recommend routine publishing of board minutes on GOV.UK after each quarterly meeting, with a standing agenda item on the work of NEDs in departments. Furthermore, the Government Lead Non-Executive reports should be published routinely within four months of the reporting year ending at the end of March. We therefore expect the report covering 2022–23 to be published by August

From: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Seventh Report - The Role of Non-Executive Directors in Government (HC 318), 20 June 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 8 September 2023 (deadline 1 September 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response to the Committee's report is mixed: it agrees with some recommendations on transparency and appointments, and does not agree with others, including updating or replacing the Code by the end of the calendar year.

  • On the Corporate Governance Code, the government "respectfully does not agree" that it should be updated or replaced by the end of the year; it "will consider" whether the Code "would benefit from some updates", wishing departments to "retain flexibility".
  • It agrees that roles and responsibilities of non-executive board members and terms of reference should be published on departmental websites, and that departures from the Code should be reported in annual reports and accounts.
  • On appointments, it says non-executive board member appointments are now regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments, a commitment it describes as "now been met". It does not agree that Peers should be restricted, and says an exclusion for former Special Advisers "would not align" with the Governance Code for Public Appointments.
  • It does not agree that the Government Lead Non-Executive should act as a "quasi-regulator", and does not support routine publication of board minutes. It will "consider" the findings of the Governance and Accountability Review "in due course" once published.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error