Source · Select Committees · Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Recommendation 1
1
Paragraph: 18
Increase public accountability and clarity regarding non-executive board members' purpose and activities.
Recommendation
Non-executive board members were brought in in their current form in 2010 to “make Government operate in a more business-like manner”. However, it is unclear whether the corporate governance of Whitehall still sits at the centre of their purpose and activities. The role of non-executive board members and lead non-executive board members are broadly defined in the Corporate Governance Code for Central Government Departments and the accompanying guidance note. However, our evidence suggests that, in practice, how boards and NEDs are used is highly dependent on the relevant Secretary of State and often NEDs wield significantly more responsibilities within their department outside the board than is publicly documented or defined. This is problematic, as it hinders the transparency, consistency, and accountability of their positions. We welcome efforts by the Government Lead Non-Executive to promote consistency through the provision of centralised guidance and coordination. However, the Corporate Governance Code is insufficient and there should be more public accountability and clarity on the work of NEDs and their purpose.
Paragraph Reference:
18
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 8 September 2023. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗