Select committee: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

Recommendation 17

Eighth Report - Where Civil Servants Work: Planning for the future of the Government’s estates Published 27 Jul 2023 Paragraph 96
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The Government’s claims for Places for Growth imply that it expects there to be an appreciable difference in mindset between policy officials employed in London and those in regional offices, and a corresponding change to policy. However, the responsible Minister was not able to pinpoint how policy advice drafted in a regional office would be different from that drafted in Whitehall. Even where some staff in regional offices may be more likely to have different educational and professional backgrounds, the majority of policy officials are likely to be university graduates wherever they are based given current recruitment criteria, with a certain broad shared framework of intellectual values and approaches this tends to imply. It remains unclear, both as to what changes Ministers want to see in the policy advice they receive from officials, and how the fact of basing more officials in regional Hubs will achieve these changes. The Cabinet Office should publish details of its understanding of how the location of officials influences the advice they provide, setting out how exactly it expects recruiting staff to regional offices will lead to tangible differences in policy development and improvements to the welfare of citizens and communities.

From: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Eighth Report - Where Civil Servants Work: Planning for the future of the Government’s estates (HC 793), paragraph 96, 27 July 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 18 October 2023.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government states that it supports enhanced transparency and has "accepted recommendations where appropriate", while pointing to existing mechanisms on others and leaving some decisions with individual departments.

  • On programme documentation, the Government says it "will publish relevant programme documentation" for Places for Growth and the Plan for London, and "will refresh the appropriate pages" to include purpose, objectives and critical success factors.
  • On Cabinet meetings outside London, it states that planning must balance regional benefits with ministerial parliamentary availability and taxpayers' money, and that "for security reasons" it does not announce when and where meetings will take place.
  • On civil service headcount, it says the policy of reducing numbers by 91,000 FTE "would not be pursued" and that any reductions are "for individual departments to determine".
  • On the Government Property Agency's value for money, it states the Agency delivers "excellent value for money" and is undertaking a benefits review against its original business case, with no external review commitment stated.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error