Select committee: Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

Strategic Leadership in the Civil Service: Building Future Capacity inquiry

Closed Opened 19 Jul 2018 Closed 19 Jul 2018
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
How the Civil Service builds the skills of its future leaders is central to the quality of government in the UK. The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee's recent inquiry into Civil Service Effectiveness welcomed the emphasis that the Civil Service places on developing its future capacity. But it found that provision was piecemeal and an overarching, coordinating body was conspicuous by its absence. The Committee therefore committed to holding a further inquiry into these issues. The Committee can now announce a new inquiry into "Strategic Leadership in the Civil Service: Building Future Capacity". The Committee welcomes written submissions addressing the following questions: How should the Civil Service sustain itself as an institution? How does the Civil Service build its future capacity? What has been the effect of changes to the provision of learning and development in the Civil Service? How are Civil Service values understood and sustained? What learning and development provision in the Civil Service is required? How much does Civil Service Learning provide a coherent professional development for civil servants at all levels? What do Civil Servants need to know and what is the appropriate balance between specialist and generalist skills? What is the appropriate model of provision of learning and development? What should be the balance between in-house and outsourced provision? What lessons can be learnt from other jurisdictions? To what extent do these issues also apply to the diplomatic service?

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 19 July 2018.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently 19th Report - Strategic Leadership in the Civil Service: Sustaining Self Governance and Future Capability while Supporting the Government of the Day on 22 July 2019.

The government's response

Published 10 October 2019.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the inquiry and says it is "confident that we have the most effective model", so it does not take up the recommendation for a new central learning institution, while setting out plans for the Civil Service Leadership Academy (CSLA).

  • On a new central institution, the response says "a single institution would not meet the needs of a diverse organisation", and favours a "learning ecosystem" balancing centralised and decentralised provision.
  • On the CSLA, the Leadership and Talent Board supports its continued growth and the government "will develop a strong case for further core funding" via the spending review. The timeline, "subject to confirmation of funding", includes launching the full SCS leadership offer in November 2020.
  • On funding, the CSLA model will be "a blended one", combining core funding with recharging departments pro rata for their candidates. Location is "being explored" through the CSLA Business Case, with a single site and a regional model with a smaller central hub both under consideration.
  • On governance, the response says each department is responsible for its own learning and development, and sets out oversight by the People Board and the Leadership and Talent Board. It will "seek ministerial support" for a learning strategy to be published alongside the forthcoming Workforce Strategy, and says it will update the Committee.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

4 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
7 May 2019
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
15 Jan 2019
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
18 Dec 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
16 Oct 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗