Source · Select Committees · Petitions Committee
Recommendation 15
15
Rejected
We support calls for the Online Safety Bill to include a foundational duty on platforms...
Recommendation
We support calls for the Online Safety Bill to include a foundational duty on platforms to protect users from reasonably foreseeable risks of harm identified in their risk assessments, including harm arising from abusive content that is legal but harmful to adults. We recommend that this should include an explicit expectation that platforms consider how not only content moderation, but also changes to system design and user functionalities, could help mitigate or prevent these risks. (Paragraph 67) Online abuse and the criminal law
Government response summary AI-generated
The government rejects the recommendation for a single foundational duty to protect users from foreseeable harm, arguing it would create an uncertain operating environment. However, it states the Bill already requires service providers to assess risks linked to service design and user functionalities.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government · verbatim extract
Rejected
We thank the Committee for its suggestion. However, we do not believe that reformulating this regulatory framework around a single foundational duty would be desirable or effective. It would leave Ofcom with very high-level duties to enforce against which would likely create an uncertain and unclear operating environment. Such an environment could also lead to a reduction in legal certainty for services, Ofcom and users as well as potential delays to the vital safety benefits for users that this legislation will bring. The framework will improve user safety by creating duties on platforms to assess risk for specific categories of harms, and to put in place systems and processes to mitigate identified risks. The Bill directly requires service providers to assess the risk of harm linked to how their services are designed and to consider how a comprehensive range of functionalities and the way in which people use their services affect risk. For example they will have to look at how users can send messages to or play games with other users and express views on content through “likes” or voting. The duties include specific requirements to put in place proportionate systems to remove and limit the spread of illegal content and to protect children from harmful content. The largest services will also need to set and enforce clear terms of service for tackling legal but harmful content. Online Abuse and the Criminal Law
Read the full response on Parliament ↗