Source · Select Committees · Northern Ireland Affairs Committee
Recommendation 12
12
Rejected
Prioritise enabling the Northern Ireland Assembly to elect a Speaker during crises.
Conclusion
We understand the cautionary arguments against short-term reform to the process for the election of the Speaker. In previous instances of institutional boycott, the possibility of reforming the thresholds for electing key institutional roles such as Speaker of the Assembly was not seriously considered. This, coupled to the passing of time, is insufficient reason to preclude limited, purposeful intervention to make the institutions more operable in times of crisis for Northern Ireland, when stable and effective government is perhaps needed more than ever. The ability of the Assembly to elect a Speaker is fundamental to this and we see it as a priority that the Assembly has a Speaker in place as soon as possible. (Paragraph 77) 76 The effectiveness of the institutions of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement
Government Response Summary
The government rejected the implicit call for intervention to reform the Speaker election process, stating that a review of the Agreement or amendment of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 is not being considered at this time due to the recent restoration of the Executive. It explained that such proposals would significantly depart from cross-community protections.
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government
Rejected
Rejected for now. Given the recent restoration of the Northern Ireland Executive, a review of the Agreement, or amendment of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 is not being considered at this time. The Government recognises the challenges the report highlights in balancing cross-community governance with institutional stability in Northern Ireland. The Government’s long-standing approach is to work with the locally elected parties in Northern Ireland, on the basis of cross-community consent, to make necessary changes to the governance arrangements in Northern Ireland to enable the more effective operation of the institutions. The New Decade New Approach deal of 2020 and the Northern Ireland (Ministers, Elections and Petitions of Concern) Act 2022 are examples of addressing concerns. Discussion on the titles and nomination process for First Minister and deputy First Minister has been ongoing since the St Andrews Agreement in 2006. The way the Executive operates requires the First Minister and deputy First Minister to work together. The proposal to nominate the Speaker (Presiding Officer) of the Assembly and to nominate “Joint First Ministers” on a supermajority basis would represent a significant departure from the original cross-community protections of the Agreement, which the Government believes would require significant consultation and consideration. We remain committed to upholding the long established three-strand approach to Northern Ireland affairs, meaning that any reforms to the devolved, strand one, institutions are primarily for the Northern Ireland parties and the UK Government, while ensuring the Irish Government were engaged in the event of substantive reform.