Select committee: Northern Ireland Affairs Committee

Recommendation 16

2nd Report – The Government's new approach to addressing the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland Published 1 Dec 2025 Addressed to Northern Ireland Executive; Northern Ireland Office

Northern Ireland Affairs Committee The Government's new approach to addressing the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗

Recommendation (the committee's words)

All the reform, goodwill and political impetus in the world will not lead to truth and justice if there is not enough money–either for investigatory or information-disclosing bodies. Despite the initial £250 million allocation to legacy mechanisms, this funding pot has not been updated to account for any of the new mechanisms proposed through the Troubles Bill. Indeed, additional duties on the Commission, responsibilities on bodies charged with identifying and disclosing information and ongoing legacy work currently funded through the devolved settlement all need to be accounted for. Without robust safeguards, regular review, and additional support, including by means of a new, recurring and ring-fenced Government funding stream to meet legacy costs within the PSNI, these reforms risk failure, not least in respect of the provision of contemporary policing in Northern Ireland’s unique and chronically underfunded policing and security context. (Conclusion, Paragraph 106)

From: Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, 2nd Report – The Government's new approach to addressing the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland (HC 586), 1 December 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 12 February 2026 (deadline 1 February 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government responds to the Committee's recommendations on the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill by stating that the Bill will deliver "the necessary reform of the Commission", while saying it will keep engaging and consider improvements as the Bill progresses.

On a statutory ECHR-compliance requirement, the government says that putting such a requirement in primary legislation for a specific function is "unnecessary", because the Commission will be subject to section 6 of the Human Rights Act.
On information disclosure, the government says it "does not intend to introduce a merits-based appeal" against ministerial decisions, citing the primacy of the Executive in decisions on the security of the State.
On the definition of "close family member", the government says it believes the current approach is "balanced", while recognising "different views" and saying it "will continue to engage and carefully consider these".
On veterans, the government will "not, therefore, accept any proposals" to reintroduce the Legacy Act's immunity provisions, but is giving "careful consideration" to additional measures that must be practically deliverable and human rights compliant.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error