Select committee: Northern Ireland Affairs Committee

Recommendation 10

2nd Report – The Government's new approach to addressing the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland Published 1 Dec 2025 Addressed to Northern Ireland Executive; Northern Ireland Office

Northern Ireland Affairs Committee The Government's new approach to addressing the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗

Recommendation (the committee's words)

In the interests of transparency, we recommend that the Government publish an indicative list of these consultees. Additionally, the Government must explain the membership and remit of the oversight board more clearly to those stakeholders in whom it needs to build more confidence in its proposals, including what practicable steps it is taking to include international expertise, beyond the parties to the Joint Framework. There is also a case for ensuring that monitoring reviews of the commission take place annually. (Recommendation, Paragraph 73)

From: Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, 2nd Report – The Government's new approach to addressing the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland (HC 586), 1 December 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 12 February 2026 (deadline 1 February 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government responds to the Committee's recommendations on the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill by stating that the Bill will deliver "the necessary reform of the Commission", while saying it will keep engaging and consider improvements as the Bill progresses.

On a statutory ECHR-compliance requirement, the government says that putting such a requirement in primary legislation for a specific function is "unnecessary", because the Commission will be subject to section 6 of the Human Rights Act.
On information disclosure, the government says it "does not intend to introduce a merits-based appeal" against ministerial decisions, citing the primacy of the Executive in decisions on the security of the State.
On the definition of "close family member", the government says it believes the current approach is "balanced", while recognising "different views" and saying it "will continue to engage and carefully consider these".
On veterans, the government will "not, therefore, accept any proposals" to reintroduce the Legacy Act's immunity provisions, but is giving "careful consideration" to additional measures that must be practically deliverable and human rights compliant.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error