Select committee: International Development Committee
Recommendation 21
First Report - The FCDO’s approach to sexual and reproductive health
Published 25 Jan 2024
Paragraph 80
Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
International Development Committee FCDO’s approach to sexual and reproductive health All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Recommendation (the committee's words)
People with disabilities may face additional barriers to accessing SRHR programmes and providing services to people with disabilities may often take additional resources. Consequently, organisations implementing development programmes may be disincentivised from reaching marginalised groups as programmes are often required to show that they have reached as many recipients as possible. The FCDO should ensure that all SRHR programmes are accessible to people with disabilities. 44 The FCDO’s approach to sexual and reproductive health FCDO’s SRHR programmes should include a dedicated budget, baselines, targets, and key performance indicators so that people with disabilities are fully integrated into aid programmes. In addition, all FCDO programming on SRHR should record disaggregated data on aid recipients, including age, sex, and disability to assess how successful they are at inclusivity.
From: International Development Committee, First Report - The FCDO’s approach to sexual and reproductive health (HC 108), paragraph 80, 25 January 2024
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 17 May 2024 (deadline 25 March 2024).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government agrees with many of the Committee's conclusions on sexual and reproductive health and rights, but disagrees with setting minimum spending targets and partially agrees with others, citing the need for flexibility.
- It agrees that cuts to UK ODA budgets have affected its SRHR work, saying "it is incontrovertible that damage was done", and agrees that consistent and long-term funding is necessary.
- It disagrees with recommendation 3 on a minimum percentage of bilateral ODA for SRHR, saying such targets "could result in a suboptimal portfolio of programming". It gives similar reasons for preferring budget flexibility on WASH and health personnel training targets.
- On multilateral funding it partially agrees, but says it "cannot agree to meet a set level of financial commitment, or restore discretionary funding". It is "unable to return our core funding" to UNFPA to pre-Covid-19 levels.
- It commits to publishing an Ending Preventable Deaths narrative report in 2024, reporting through existing mechanisms rather than setting up a parallel framework.