Select committee: International Development Committee

Recommendation 14

Second Report - Humanitarian situation in Gaza Published 1 Mar 2024 Paragraph 51 Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Recommendation (the committee's words)
There needs to be a three-pillar approach to this crisis and its lasting resolution – covering political, security and humanitarian. All three are essential and cannot be seen in isolation, and whilst it is not the remit of this Committee to make recommendations in the political or security arenas, the UK Government must do more in all three – both to help ease the suffering of the civilians in Gaza and also maintain, or possibly try to regain, its credibility with its partner countries in this region.

From: International Development Committee, Second Report - Humanitarian situation in Gaza (HC 110), paragraph 51, 1 March 2024

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 8 May 2024 (deadline 1 May 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government marks most of the Committee's recommendations as "Agree", marks three as "Partially Agree", and says it is "focussed on practical solutions that save lives".

  • On land crossings and aid access, it marks the recommendation "Agree" and says it "continue[s] to press Israel" for further changes, welcoming Israel's undertaking to raise aid flows to 500 trucks a day and wanting Israel to fulfil it "as quickly as possible".
  • On a reconstruction conference, it marks the recommendation "Partially Agree": it agrees the international community must consider recovery now, but is "not at this stage ready to commit to the UK hosting an international conference".
  • On UNRWA, it marks the recommendation "Agree" but makes no commitment to resume funding, saying it "will set out our position on future funding" after "careful consideration" of the final report, UNRWA's response and the ongoing OIOS investigation.
  • On international humanitarian law, it "Partially Agree[s]", stating that grave concerns on humanitarian access are "not sufficient to undermine our judgement that Israel is committed to comply with IHL in general".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error