Source · Select Committees · International Development Committee
Recommendation 32
32
Accepted in Part
FCDO's strong MEL processes increase administrative demands, potentially deterring smaller NGOs.
Conclusion
Whilst the FCDO’s strong MEL processes help to ensure that programmes are delivering VfM, these expectations increase administrative demands on organisations delivering these programmes. This may lead to smaller NGOs not applying for programme funding. (Conclusion, Paragraph 102)
Government Response Summary
The government partially agrees, acknowledging the need to ensure MEL requirements do not create barriers for smaller organisations. They commit to forthcoming updates to MEL guidance and programme performance reviews to reinforce a proportionate approach, and will work to eliminate obstacles for local actors.
Government Response
Accepted in Part
HM Government
Accepted in Part
Partially agree. The FCDO is committed to ensuring that MEL requirements do not create barriers for smaller organisations. Teams are expected to apply MEL proportionately and in accordance with PrOF Rules, which allow for adjustments and flexibility in reporting where appropriate. Forthcoming updates to MEL guidance and programme performance reviews will reinforce this approach. The FCDO will increasingly work in partnership with local actors, including civil society, aiming to eliminate unnecessary obstacles to engagement with them. Whilst partner feedback is important, given the diversity of our network missions, a one-size-fits-all approach like business hubs may not be appropriate.