Source · Select Committees · International Development Committee

Recommendation 4

4 Rejected

Government must maintain accountability and leverage UK soft power in ODA spending.

Conclusion
It is the responsibility of the Government to remain accountable to the public, principally through Parliament, on how ODA is spent. However, it is also morally obliged to be accountable to those receiving UK ODA and their governments. We agree with the Development Minister that ODA should not be seen as simply a tool for increasing the influence of the UK. However, in a contested world, the UK cannot allow any misunderstanding about its commitment to its bilateral partners which could give its adversaries a foothold. Moreover, as the Government recognises, the UK’s diplomatic capital allows it to affect changes that dramatically improve the lives of the poor. This leverage must not be diminished through weak communications over the UK’s financial commitments or lack of oversight over programmes it funds. The Committee see the value of UK soft power in promoting human rights, democracy and the rule-based international order. The UK can and should be unashamed to promote its values, language, and culture in a world where significant powers, who do not share our values, are expanding their influence. (Conclusion, Paragraph 16) 14
Government response summary AI-generated
The government disagrees, stating they are putting modern development partnerships at the heart of their new approach, responding to partners' needs, and using the UK's global soft power assets to promote UK values.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Government Response Rejected
HM Government · verbatim extract Rejected
Recommendation 2 (para 17) To improve communication and transparency around multilateral spend, we recommend that:
Read the full response on Parliament ↗