Reports
1 report
- HC No.
- HC 504
- Published
- 1 Jul 2022
- Items
- 3
Recommendations & Conclusions
3 items
16
Recommendation
Second report - Food insecurity
Recommendation · source text
publish a comprehensive strategy setting out its plan to address food insecurity; and a) increase humanitarian funding for food assistance programmes to reflect increased global food and fuel costs and to meet need. b) To promote sustainable agriculture, the Government must increase support to agricultural development programmes in middle-and-lower-income
Link to this item · Read item and full response
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
17
Recommendation
Second report - Food insecurity
Recommendation · source text
countries. The Government must work with international partners to:
Link to this item · Read item and full response
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
18
Recommendation
Second report - Food insecurity
Recommendation · source text
empower the Global Alliance for Food Security to develop international solutions to regional food security challenges. That should include a) securing the provision, delivery and distribution of food assistance to countries in need in order to avert famine. Such initiatives should prioritise countries with communities classed on the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification as in Phase 3 (Crisis) or above; and support Ukraine to transport its food produce for both internal consumption and international export to help feed in-need communities. b) Such support should include the supply of protective equipment and transport vehicles to Ukraine and participation in multilateral initiatives to facilitate food exports by Ukraine. Food insecurity 13 Food insecurity classifications Food insecurity is measured by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) and Cadre Harmonisé (CH) framework. The IPC is used in around 30 countries and the CH is used in 18 countries. The two measures are “very close to each other and give comparable figures of acute food insecurity.” The five-phase classification, as shown in 71 the table below, “is the same though there are a few differences pertaining to the use of 72 certain indicators, classification of famine and estimation of humanitarian assistance.” The IPC/CH classifications were used to determine the number of people in Phase 3 ‘Crisis’ 73 or worse (Phases 4 and 5) in each country for the map included in the Report. Table 2: IPC acute food insecurity reference table Phase Phase name Phase description number 1 Minimal/None Households are able to meet essential food and non-food needs without engaging in atypical and unsustainable strategies to access food and income. 2 Stressed Households have minimally adequate food consumption but are unable to afford some essential non-food expenditures without engaging in stress- coping strategies. 3 Crisis Households either have food consumption gaps that are reflected by high or
Link to this item · Read item and full response
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Correspondence
2 letters
On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.