Syrian refugee crisis
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“The International Development Committee urges the Government to back Save the Children's proposal of accepting an additional 3,000 refugee children from within Europe. This is in addition to the current commitment to resettle 20,000 refugees from the region.”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
The conflict in Syria has given rise to perhaps the most severe humanitarian crisis since the Second World War. Countries of the region were minor recipients of UK bilateral aid prior to the start of the conflict, yet the Government has responded impressively by contributing over £1.1 billion to the relief effort which receives our full backing. Despite the UK’s relief efforts, we are concerned by the failure of other donors, particularly major European countries, to show similar commitment. This has exacerbated the present refugee crisis. We are seeing a reduction in basic humanitarian assistance and without a substantial increase in funding, the suffering of Syrians will worsen and more will risk their lives making dangerous journeys to secure a future in Europe.
The Government should use all available channels to press other donors into making adequate contributions to the fund.
We would also like to stress the importance of directing a greater share of funding towards the most vulnerable refugees. This is particularly important for those who reside outside official camps: while they may be the most difficult to reach, they are often the most in need.
We received strong representations that Syrian refugees should be allowed to work in neighbouring countries. We recognise the fragilities in host-country labour markets and the inherent difficulties in absorbing Syrian workers. There must be international support for sustainable employment solutions that provide income, dignity and future prospects to Syrian refugees and members of host communities alike.
We heard evidence that approaches which seek to provide sustainable solutions to protracted crises are difficult to implement in the context of the current global humanitarian architecture. We urge the Government to use the World Humanitarian Summit in May 2016 to press for an approach to humanitarian crises that better coordinates short-term assistance with longer term development objectives such as education, healthcare and livelihoods.
We welcome the Government’s expansion of the Vulnerable Persons Relocation Scheme (VPRS) to resettle Syrian refugees, and commend the commitment to identify and assist the most vulnerable refugees through the scheme. We are concerned that the present processes may fail to include some vulnerable groups such as refugees from the LGBT community, refugees with disabilities, and Christians and other religious minorities. We recommend that the UK Government and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) monitor resettlement referrals and take action if these minorities are insufficiently represented among the cases received. We commend DFID on its efforts to ensure that aid reaches those who are most directly affected by the conflict in Syria itself. With the escalation of the UK’s role in the conflict, DFID should form a central part of planning processes to ensure that the humanitarian situation within the country does not deteriorate further.
What the government said
The government responded on 9 March 2016.
The government welcomes the Committee's report and agrees with most recommendations, but states that it does not think resettling unaccompanied refugee children from within Europe is "the right approach".
- On funding, DFID agrees with the Committee's concern about donor shortfalls, and notes the UK will "more than double" its total pledge to the crisis from £1.12 billion to over £2.3 billion.
- On unaccompanied children, it "partially agrees" and will instead work with UNHCR to resettle unaccompanied children from conflict regions, "where this is in their best interests", and DFID is creating a fund of up to £10 million.
- On CDC investing in refugee-hosting countries, it "partially agrees": the Middle East is currently ineligible, the policy will be reviewed in a strategy review expected to complete by the end of the year, and it will "carefully consider" expanding the scope.
- On ESOL funding it "partially agrees"; it states that ESOL is a key factor in integration and that local authorities must provide Syrians with ESOL training for twelve months, with funding included.
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 17 September 2015 to its close on 9 March 2016.
- Oral evidence 3 sessions
- Report 5 Jan 2016
- Government response 9 Mar 2016
What it recommended 10 recommendations · 19 conclusions
1We strongly commend DFID for setting an exemplary standard in its commitment to funding humanitarian...
2We urge the Government to apply more pressure on other donors to meet their 0.7%...
3We are gravely concerned about the increased tensions between host communities and refugees, particularly given...
4We recommend that DFID build upon its existing efforts and scale up the use of...
5Whilst the UK Government strategy has focused on helping refugees in Syria and elsewhere in...
6We commend the Government’s support within the region for three reasons.
7We welcome the Minister’s statement that he hoped to bring forward a proposal early next...
8As the refugee crisis has become increasingly protracted, the need for legal employment opportunities for...
9Given that other countries are making considerable investment commitments in Jordan, we recommend that DFID...
10We see the identification of long-term opportunities to create jobs in countries hosting refugees as...
11DFID should make use of CDC Group’s expertise in private sector investment and should discuss...
12The global approach to protracted crises should be a key topic at next year’s World...
13We recommend that DFID focus its efforts at the Summit on this issue in three...
14The challenge for the Government and its partners, chiefly UNHCR, therefore lies in ensuring that...
15We note the Resolution of the House (2 December) supporting action against Daesh in Syria,...
16The UK must do all it can to mitigate the risk of worsening the humanitarian...
17We welcome DFID’s approach of directing approximately 75% of overall humanitarian assistance towards host communities.
18DFID should press all UN agencies and NGOs, particularly the major UK aid recipients, to...
19The risks faced by anyone that has been forced to flee their home are substantial.
20We recommend that the Government continue to carefully monitor the profiles of cases referred for...
21We are concerned about the ban that has forced the UNCHR to stop registering new...
22We urge DFID to press the Lebanese Government harder to allow the resumption of registration...
23We are gravely concerned about the situation for Syrian child refugees and we commend DFID’s...
24We urge the Government to come to a quick decision on the proposal by Save...
25We have heard evidence that a reduction in available funding from international donors other than...
26The Government should be prepared for the possibility that the speed of resettlements may take...
27We support the Minister’s proposal of a skills matching scheme to help refugees transition into...
28We urge the Government to reconsider the cuts to ESOL funding as we believe that...
29We welcome the news that support will continue beyond the first year, particularly given the...
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 3
- 24 Nov 2015No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 17 Nov 2015No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 29 Oct 2015No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗