Select committee inquiry

Syrian refugee crisis

Closed

International Development Committee · Opened 17 September 2015 · Closed 9 March 2016

10 recommendations · 19 conclusions
Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗

What the inquiry looked at

“The International Development Committee urges the Government to back Save the Children's proposal of accepting an additional 3,000 refugee children from within Europe. This is in addition to the current commitment to resettle 20,000 refugees from the region.”

The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.

What it found

In the committee's words, from the summary of 1st Report - Syrian refugee crisis ↗

The conflict in Syria has given rise to perhaps the most severe humanitarian crisis since the Second World War. Countries of the region were minor recipients of UK bilateral aid prior to the start of the conflict, yet the Government has responded impressively by contributing over £1.1 billion to the relief effort which receives our full backing. Despite the UK’s relief efforts, we are concerned by the failure of other donors, particularly major European countries, to show similar commitment. This has exacerbated the present refugee crisis. We are seeing a reduction in basic humanitarian assistance and without a substantial increase in funding, the suffering of Syrians will worsen and more will risk their lives making dangerous journeys to secure a future in Europe.

The Government should use all available channels to press other donors into making adequate contributions to the fund.

We would also like to stress the importance of directing a greater share of funding towards the most vulnerable refugees. This is particularly important for those who reside outside official camps: while they may be the most difficult to reach, they are often the most in need.

We received strong representations that Syrian refugees should be allowed to work in neighbouring countries. We recognise the fragilities in host-country labour markets and the inherent difficulties in absorbing Syrian workers. There must be international support for sustainable employment solutions that provide income, dignity and future prospects to Syrian refugees and members of host communities alike.

We heard evidence that approaches which seek to provide sustainable solutions to protracted crises are difficult to implement in the context of the current global humanitarian architecture. We urge the Government to use the World Humanitarian Summit in May 2016 to press for an approach to humanitarian crises that better coordinates short-term assistance with longer term development objectives such as education, healthcare and livelihoods.

We welcome the Government’s expansion of the Vulnerable Persons Relocation Scheme (VPRS) to resettle Syrian refugees, and commend the commitment to identify and assist the most vulnerable refugees through the scheme. We are concerned that the present processes may fail to include some vulnerable groups such as refugees from the LGBT community, refugees with disabilities, and Christians and other religious minorities. We recommend that the UK Government and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) monitor resettlement referrals and take action if these minorities are insufficiently represented among the cases received. We commend DFID on its efforts to ensure that aid reaches those who are most directly affected by the conflict in Syria itself. With the escalation of the UK’s role in the conflict, DFID should form a central part of planning processes to ensure that the humanitarian situation within the country does not deteriorate further.

What the government said

The government responded on 9 March 2016.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response.

The government welcomes the Committee's report and agrees with most recommendations, but states that it does not think resettling unaccompanied refugee children from within Europe is "the right approach".

  • On funding, DFID agrees with the Committee's concern about donor shortfalls, and notes the UK will "more than double" its total pledge to the crisis from £1.12 billion to over £2.3 billion.
  • On unaccompanied children, it "partially agrees" and will instead work with UNHCR to resettle unaccompanied children from conflict regions, "where this is in their best interests", and DFID is creating a fund of up to £10 million.
  • On CDC investing in refugee-hosting countries, it "partially agrees": the Middle East is currently ineligible, the policy will be reviewed in a strategy review expected to complete by the end of the year, and it will "carefully consider" expanding the scope.
  • On ESOL funding it "partially agrees"; it states that ESOL is a key factor in integration and that local authorities must provide Syrians with ESOL training for twelve months, with funding included.

How the inquiry ran

Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 17 September 2015 to its close on 9 March 2016.

  1. Oral evidence 3 sessions
  2. Report 5 Jan 2016
  3. Government response 9 Mar 2016

What it recommended 10 recommendations · 19 conclusions

1We strongly commend DFID for setting an exemplary standard in its commitment to funding humanitarian...
Concluded (the committee's words)
We strongly commend DFID for setting an exemplary standard in its commitment to funding humanitarian assistance to address the Syrian crisis. We are very concerned at the lack of financial support from other donors. Wealthy countries again committed to the goal of spending 0.7% of Gross National Income (GNI) on Official Development Assistance (ODA) this summer at the Financing for Development conference in Addis Ababa, but are not being held to account for delivery against this commitment. This is a serious problem in the face of increasing humanitarian needs. Evidence indicates a link between the reduction in assistance and increases in dangerous onward migration from the Middle East to Europe.
2We urge the Government to apply more pressure on other donors to meet their 0.7%...
Recommended (the committee's words)
We urge the Government to apply more pressure on other donors to meet their 0.7% commitment and direct an appropriate proportion of ODA towards the Syrian crisis. Efforts should be focused towards meeting the full financial requirement of the Regional Refugee and Resilience Plan (3RP), in order to support Governments of the region through a coordinated strategy to strengthen basic services in these countries, ease host-community pressures, and help prevent dangerous migration journeys.
3We are gravely concerned about the increased tensions between host communities and refugees, particularly given...
Concluded (the committee's words)
We are gravely concerned about the increased tensions between host communities and refugees, particularly given the risk that such tensions might further contribute to regional instability. We have received strong evidence about the need for a new approach to humanitarian assistance. Research suggests that cash programming may provide a valuable means of delivering support in a way that offers dignity for refugees and facilitates peaceful co-existence with host communities by benefitting local economies.
4We recommend that DFID build upon its existing efforts and scale up the use of...
Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that DFID build upon its existing efforts and scale up the use of cash-based assistance in the region. It should use the recommendations of the High Level Panel on Cash Transfers as a blueprint for how to do so, and strive to make cash its default means of delivering humanitarian assistance. This is particularly important for targeting the most vulnerable, as refugees with specific needs will have a better understanding of how to meet these needs than aid agencies. We are also gravely concerned about the overall impact on the economies of host countries, and urge DFID to work with the World Bank and other institutions to ensure that they receive the necessary long-term support which is vital to their economic survival.
5Whilst the UK Government strategy has focused on helping refugees in Syria and elsewhere in...
Recommended (the committee's words)
Whilst the UK Government strategy has focused on helping refugees in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East, many of the British public appear unaware of the extent of this. The Government should ensure that the public are aware of both the extent of its support and the benefits of supporting refugees in their own country.
6We commend the Government’s support within the region for three reasons.
Concluded (the committee's words)
We commend the Government’s support within the region for three reasons. Firstly, evidence suggests that despite the operational challenges of delivering assistance in the Middle East, it is more cost-effective to support refugees in the region than it is to direct resources towards resettling them in the UK. Secondly, we heard that it is actually in the best interests of the majority of refugees to stay closer to home, though they require adequate funding to support this. Thirdly, one of the key factors driving refugees towards dangerous trips across the Mediterranean is cuts to humanitarian assistance, which in turn is driven by insufficient funding from donors. This suggests that sufficient funding to help humanitarian organisations support an adequate standard of living in the region will deter many more refugees from risking their lives in this way. As John Ging of UN OCHA wrote, it is only the prospect of a better future that will prevent refugees from leaving the region.
7We welcome the Minister’s statement that he hoped to bring forward a proposal early next...
Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the Minister’s statement that he hoped to bring forward a proposal early next year, and emphasise that such a proposal must move beyond short-term employment responses towards finding areas of economic growth that can create sustainable employment solutions. This should involve the provision of education beyond primary school age to include skills training. We see a coordinated and carefully planned effort to address this issue as essential to the long-term sustainability of refugees’ presence in host countries.
8As the refugee crisis has become increasingly protracted, the need for legal employment opportunities for...
Concluded (the committee's words)
As the refugee crisis has become increasingly protracted, the need for legal employment opportunities for Syrian refugees has grown. Evidence suggests that they want to work, yet legal restrictions mean they are forced to remain reliant on humanitarian assistance or find work in the informal sector. This model is unsustainable in the long-term and has a particularly negative effect on child refugees. DFID can help develop employment opportunities in host countries and put the Syrian refugee crisis response on a more sustainable development footing.
9Given that other countries are making considerable investment commitments in Jordan, we recommend that DFID...
Recommended (the committee's words)
Given that other countries are making considerable investment commitments in Jordan, we recommend that DFID engage with the Jordan Investment Commission and other partners to explore opportunities to leverage these projects to create jobs for refugees. We recommend that DFID use its expertise in the field of economic development and works with suitable partners to identify and develop opportunities for investment, economic growth and sustainable job creation to the benefit of Syrian refugees and host communities alike. Specifically it should extend its inclusive growth diagnostic exercise to refugee hosting countries in the Middle East.
10We see the identification of long-term opportunities to create jobs in countries hosting refugees as...
Concluded (the committee's words)
We see the identification of long-term opportunities to create jobs in countries hosting refugees as a key response to the crisis.
11DFID should make use of CDC Group’s expertise in private sector investment and should discuss...
Concluded (the committee's words)
DFID should make use of CDC Group’s expertise in private sector investment and should discuss CDC’s remit with the CDC board and allow it to invest in countries hosting refugees. In addition, DFID should provide CDC with specific funds for it Syrian refugee crisis 31 to invest on DFID’s behalf in sustainable job-creating businesses in those countries.
12The global approach to protracted crises should be a key topic at next year’s World...
Concluded (the committee's words)
The global approach to protracted crises should be a key topic at next year’s World Humanitarian Summit in Istanbul. We are concerned about the lack of a comprehensive, long-term strategy to deal with such crises and shift funding from a reliance on humanitarian assistance towards a more development-centred approach.
13We recommend that DFID focus its efforts at the Summit on this issue in three...
Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that DFID focus its efforts at the Summit on this issue in three respects. Firstly, promote early investment in public services and economic infrastructure which can yield long-term dividends that a narrow focus on immediate humanitarian needs cannot. Secondly, negotiate commitments to provide humanitarian and development funding over multi-year timeframes, enabling the response to be better managed and more strategic. Thirdly, focus on developing areas of economic growth which will create sustainable employment solutions and ultimately help a country from aid dependency.
14The challenge for the Government and its partners, chiefly UNHCR, therefore lies in ensuring that...
Concluded (the committee's words)
The challenge for the Government and its partners, chiefly UNHCR, therefore lies in ensuring that the processes for identifying and assisting the most vulnerable refugees are robust enough to reach those most in need.
15We note the Resolution of the House (2 December) supporting action against Daesh in Syria,...
Concluded (the committee's words)
We note the Resolution of the House (2 December) supporting action against Daesh in Syria, including through air strikes. We warmly welcome the House’s support for the Government’s humanitarian assistance to Syrian refugees. The recent escalation of military efforts will have an impact on conditions faced by civilians in Syria, and may well make it more difficult for DFID and other agencies to deliver humanitarian aid.
16The UK must do all it can to mitigate the risk of worsening the humanitarian...
Concluded (the committee's words)
The UK must do all it can to mitigate the risk of worsening the humanitarian situation. The potential humanitarian consequences of protracted military engagement must be a driving force for The UK Government in pressing for ceasefire and political settlement through the vehicle of the Vienna talks.
17We welcome DFID’s approach of directing approximately 75% of overall humanitarian assistance towards host communities.
Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome DFID’s approach of directing approximately 75% of overall humanitarian assistance towards host communities. However, major aid agencies such as UNHCR, which are a conduit for much of the UK’s financial support, should be doing the same.
18DFID should press all UN agencies and NGOs, particularly the major UK aid recipients, to...
Concluded (the committee's words)
DFID should press all UN agencies and NGOs, particularly the major UK aid recipients, to ensure that vulnerable refugees outside of camps receive an appropriate level of support. This must include directing resources towards refugees in host communities because they are the most vulnerable and have disproportionately suffered from cuts to humanitarian assistance.
19The risks faced by anyone that has been forced to flee their home are substantial.
Concluded (the committee's words)
The risks faced by anyone that has been forced to flee their home are substantial. However, in the context of the Syrian crisis, certain groups are affected in ways that heighten their vulnerability. For these people resettlement is an appropriate and durable solution. We commend the UNHCR and their commitment to ensuring that processes for identifying the vulnerable are robust in an extremely complex environment with significant operational challenges. Yet evidence indicated non- registration by certain vulnerable groups, who prefer to stay outside official UN camps, is occurring and that, despite best efforts, it appears that under-registration may well also be an issue.
20We recommend that the Government continue to carefully monitor the profiles of cases referred for...
Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government continue to carefully monitor the profiles of cases referred for resettlement, including, where possible, demographics, sexuality, religion, disability status, and the location from which refugees have been selected and whether from within or outside official UN camps. Such monitoring outputs should be fed back to UNHCR to identify any groups that are underrepresented in referrals and establish and execute action to remedy this, thus ensuring that UNHCR’s principle of equal access is realised.
21We are concerned about the ban that has forced the UNCHR to stop registering new...
Concluded (the committee's words)
We are concerned about the ban that has forced the UNCHR to stop registering new refugees in Lebanon and the implications this has for refugees’ access to support.
22We urge DFID to press the Lebanese Government harder to allow the resumption of registration...
Recommended (the committee's words)
We urge DFID to press the Lebanese Government harder to allow the resumption of registration processes. Given that it has ordered the ban until a new registration mechanism is established, DFID should consult with Lebanese authorities to identify any objections to the previous processes and ensure that solutions are identified so that registrations can resume as soon as possible.
23We are gravely concerned about the situation for Syrian child refugees and we commend DFID’s...
Concluded (the committee's words)
We are gravely concerned about the situation for Syrian child refugees and we commend DFID’s commitment to helping them, both within the region through the No Lost Generation Initiative and through resettlement. However, we are very concerned about the plight of unaccompanied refugee children in Europe, particularly as reports suggest they are falling prey to people traffickers.
24We urge the Government to come to a quick decision on the proposal by Save...
Recommended (the committee's words)
We urge the Government to come to a quick decision on the proposal by Save the Children as this is a matter of utmost urgency. We would welcome a decision by the Government in favour of resettling 3,000 unaccompanied children, as recommended by Save the Children, and in addition to the current commitment to resettle 20,000 refugees from the region.
25We have heard evidence that a reduction in available funding from international donors other than...
Concluded (the committee's words)
We have heard evidence that a reduction in available funding from international donors other than the UK has reduced the capacity of multilateral organisations to deliver humanitarian protection. In the context of mounting pressure on limited humanitarian resource in the region, there is a case for delivering resettlement quickly.
26The Government should be prepared for the possibility that the speed of resettlements may take...
Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should be prepared for the possibility that the speed of resettlements may take on greater urgency. The Government should also explore urgently how to better harness the substantial goodwill and offers of support for Syrian refugees, from local community groups within the UK seeking to support refugees settled here.
27We support the Minister’s proposal of a skills matching scheme to help refugees transition into...
Concluded (the committee's words)
We support the Minister’s proposal of a skills matching scheme to help refugees transition into working life in the UK, but we are concerned about cuts to ESOL funding. The long waiting lists are evidence that demand already outstrips supply.
28We urge the Government to reconsider the cuts to ESOL funding as we believe that...
Recommended (the committee's words)
We urge the Government to reconsider the cuts to ESOL funding as we believe that they are counterproductive to integration plans.
29We welcome the news that support will continue beyond the first year, particularly given the...
Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the news that support will continue beyond the first year, particularly given the financial pressures that many local authorities are under.

Evidence

Oral evidence sessions 3