Source · Select Committees · Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee
Recommendation 14
14
Acknowledged
Paragraph: 73
Proposed actions to clear audit backlog are necessary but require further implementation.
Conclusion
The Department has proposed a series of actions to clear the audit backlog, which include resetting the system through a limited series of statutory deadlines for the delivery of outstanding audits from previous financial years. These proposals represent a necessary first step towards overcoming the audit crisis. However, more work is needed to implement them and to resolve the issues in the local audit system to achieve meaningful and much needed change in the sector.
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the need for action to clear the audit backlog and states that a consultation on their proposals will begin in early February, emphasizing that this has involved detailed and complex work with system partners.
Paragraph Reference:
73
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government
Acknowledged
We are working to clear the unprecedented backlog and our consultation on proposals will begin in early February. This has been detailed and complex work, balancing various imperatives across the system. We have engaged with stakeholders across the sector and have developed a proposal that has the agreement of all system partners. We will continue to provide updates to the Committee on progress at key junctures. Auditors are already required under International Standards on Auditing (UK) to outline the reason for any modified opinions. System partners, including the FRC as the body which develops and maintain auditing standards within the UK, recognise the importance of communicating the reasons behind an issuance of any modified opinion and will be supporting stakeholders in understanding the different types of opinions which can be issued and what they mean. The NAO is responsible for providing guidance to auditors on the way in which auditors report and will shortly be consulting on a revised Code of Audit Practice. Auditors’ statutory duty to report on value for money arrangements and their statutory audit powers (such as the power to make statutory recommendations or produce Public Interest Reports where necessary) are an important mechanism for assurance and for identifying areas of concern at an early stage, allowing councils to address them. Under the government’s proposals this will remain a high priority. While timeliness has long been a requirement of the Code, and there are already mechanisms by which auditors can flag concerns about financial failings, the forthcoming NAO consultation proposes further measures to make reporting on local bodies’ arrangements to secure value for money more timely. We recognise that the proposal to introduce a backstop will result in a number of disclaimers or qualifications, and we are considering with system partners how best to ensure consistent messaging to explain that these opinions have been issued in the context of a system-wide process to clear the backlog and are not necessarily the fault of local authorities. We remain committed to exploring how greater measures of transparency concerning audit delays could influence behaviours across the local audit system. While mechanisms such as specifically identifying fault as the Committee propose may (and already do in some respects as outlined above) have a role to play, such approaches need to be carefully considered to avoid unwarranted and unforeseen consequences. Therefore, this area requires additional time and collaboration, with input from all parts of the local audit system for full consideration and we will keep this recommendation under review.