Source · Select Committees · Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee
Recommendation 26
26
Acknowledged
Paragraph: 98
We are persuaded that the role of principal designer in the CDM regulations differs from...
Conclusion
We are persuaded that the role of principal designer in the CDM regulations differs from the one envisaged for the new dutyholder regime and that this could cause confusion in the industry.
Government response summary AI-generated
The government acknowledges the Committee's conclusion that the role of principal designer in CDM regulations differs from the new dutyholder regime and could cause industry confusion.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Paragraph Reference:
98
Government Response
Acknowledged
HM Government · verbatim extract
Acknowledged
60. The Government acknowledges that the Committee is persuaded that the role of principal designer in the CDM regulations differs from the one envisaged for the new dutyholder regime and that this could cause confusion in the industry.
Read the full response on Parliament ↗