Source · Select Committees · Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee

Recommendation 9

9 Paragraph: 29

There are substantial differences between a well-established severe weather emergency protocol, which provides short-term accommodation,...

Conclusion
There are substantial differences between a well-established severe weather emergency protocol, which provides short-term accommodation, often in night shelters or other communal spaces, and providing long-term accommodation in self-contained en-suite units with significant wraparound support. While there can be some similarities—especially the principle of ‘In for Good’—this is undermined by the different way the Government stipulates how funding can be used for Severe Weather Emergency Protocol versus Everyone In. The Everyone In funding since May 2020 cannot be spent on individuals with no recourse to public funds, in comparison to the Cold Weather Fund, which can be spent on everyone. Limiting spending in such a manner undermines a broad discretionary power and prevents local authorities from helping whomever they like, unless they spend out of their own pocket.
Paragraph Reference: 29
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 25 May 2021. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗