Select committee: Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee

Recommendation 16

First Report - The future of the planning system in England Published 10 Jun 2021 Paragraph 112 Addressed to Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Recommendation (the committee's words)
In addition: • We broadly agree with the Government’s general approach of using workplace- based earnings. But for specific local authorities the Government should consider using residence-based earnings to ensure the housing targets accurately reflect local circumstances. The Government should also publish what the housing targets would be using each type of earning would use of each type of earnings would result in. • The Government should commission and use new household projections. These should take account of the criticisms of the current approach made by the Office for Statistics Regulation; and take account of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Calculations of housing need should also incorporate properties that could be converted and repaired. The Government should also take account of criticisms of the existing ‘standard method’ and directly incorporate availability of brownfield sites, environmental and other constraints on developable land, and the wish to level up into the standard method formula. • The Government should permit local authorities to undertake their own assessment of housing need for inclusion in the Local Plan, if they disagree with the nationally set figures for their local area (which would be accepted by the Planning Inspectorate). Local authority’s assessment could then be evaluated by the Planning Inspectorate.

From: Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee, First Report - The future of the planning system in England (HC 38), paragraph 112, 10 June 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 17 May 2022 (deadline 10 August 2021).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response agrees with the Committee on a number of recommendations, including not pursuing the three areas proposal, while declining to extend the 30-month local plan timetable and having no plans for a national Green Belt review.

  • It agrees with the recommendation on the three areas proposal and "will not be pursuing three area types in the reformed planning system".
  • It "does not accept" the recommendation to extend the 30-month plan-making timeframe, stating that reforms make 30 months "achievable" and that it "will consult on the detail of these regulations in due course".
  • On planning fees, it intends to increase them by 35% for major and 25% for minor applications, "subject to consultation", which it says will take place in the summer.
  • On the Green Belt, it "has no plans for a national review" and says the National Planning Policy Framework's protections "will remain".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error