Source · Select Committees · Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee

Recommendation 20

20 Paragraph: 155

There is no consensus on the optimum structure for scrutiny in a devolved authority, including...

Recommendation
There is no consensus on the optimum structure for scrutiny in a devolved authority, including as to whether the London Assembly is superior to the existing combined authority structures. The new audit arrangements being introduced by the Government should consider the best way to conduct scrutiny and ensure greater transparency of the budgets of combined authorities. Scrutiny must be on a cross-party basis and scrutiny bodies should reflect this. We reiterate our predecessor committee’s recommendation in 2017 that the Government ensure there is adequate funding of the scrutiny of the metro mayors. We reiterate our predecessor committees’ recommendations in 2013 and 2016 that the London Assembly should receive a forward plan from the Mayor of London, receive call-in powers, and be able to reject the Mayor’s Police and Crime Plan and appointments for deputy mayors. The Government should also examine the case for permitting the London Assembly to scrutinise other aspects of London governance beyond those areas overseen by the mayoral administration.
Paragraph Reference: 155
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 1 March 2022. Response attribution to this recommendation has not been verified. Read the response document ↗