Select committee: Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee

Recommendation 30

Second Report - Long-term funding of adult social care Published 4 Aug 2022 Paragraph 129 Addressed to Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The Government claims “the money is there” to support carers’ breaks, but the evidence we received is that not enough carers are getting a break. There are many carers who have not had a break since the start of the pandemic. Providing intimate care, under pressure, for such a prolonged period, is bound to have an impact on a person’s mental and physical health. It is imperative that the Government announce additional ringfenced funding to enable more carers to take a break this year.

From: Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee, Second Report - Long-term funding of adult social care (HC 19), paragraph 129, 4 August 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 15 June 2023 (deadline 4 October 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it remains "fully committed" to the 10-year vision for adult social care and points to up to £7.5 billion of additional funding over two years, while declining some of the Committee's specific recommendations.

  • On funding, it cites the Autumn Statement's "up to £7.5 billion" of additional funding over two years for adult social care and discharge, with up to £2.8 billion in 2023-24 and up to £4.7 billion in 2024-25.
  • It says it "agree[s]" that market shaping should include a dedicated focus on outcomes-based commissioning, and it is investing in local authority commissioning capability.
  • It declines to introduce statutory housing plan requirements ("We do not intend to introduce statutory requirements at this time") and has "no plans" for a review of carer's assessments or to lower visa salary thresholds.
  • On a multi-year settlement, it says it "will aim to provide" one "wherever possible"; it will not proceed with the Review of Relative Needs and Resources during this Spending Review.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error