Select committee: Foreign Affairs Committee

Recommendation 7

Third Report - Sovereignty for sale: the FCDO’s role in protecting strategic British assets Published 14 Jul 2021 Paragraph 37 Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Recommendation (the committee's words)
We support the Government’s decision to keep the NSI Act agnostic of geography or type of actor, so that investments are judged on a case-by case rather than country- 30 Sovereignty for sale: the FCDO’s role in protecting strategic British assets specific basis. The FCDO has a vital role to play in communicating to other parts of government its assessment of the broader strategic intent of foreign governments in their investment decisions, and this information should be a primary consideration when considering specific transactions. The FCDO should be responsible for advising BEIS on these matters and we intend to hold the Department to account for any failure to do so.

From: Foreign Affairs Committee, Third Report - Sovereignty for sale: the FCDO’s role in protecting strategic British assets (HC 197), paragraph 37, 14 July 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 25 October 2021 (deadline 14 September 2021).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government "notes" the Committee's recommendations and agrees that the FCDO has a key role in supporting the Investment Security Unit, while not setting out a position on Newport Wafer Fab pending a National Security Adviser review.

  • On the call-in of the Newport Wafer Fab acquisition, the Government says the National Security Adviser is "presently conducting a review" and that it "would be inappropriate to comment further" before it concludes.
  • It agrees that the FCDO holds the key role in supporting the ISU, and says a dedicated FCDO team has been established and it is "identifying and securing the short and long-term capabilities required".
  • On seconding 10 per cent of ISU staff from the FCDO, it does "not consider it necessary to mandate" a specific percentage, and says it will keep staffing and structures "under close review".
  • On parliamentary scrutiny, it believes it is "right" that the BEIS Select Committee oversees the ISU, and says a Memorandum of Understanding on information access "will be published in due course".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error