Select committee: Foreign Affairs Committee

Recommendation 15

Seventh Report - Lagos calling: Nigeria and the Integrated Review Published 29 Apr 2022 Paragraph 42 Addressed to Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Recommendation (the committee's words)
We welcome the part the UK Government has played in involving the private sector in climate finance. We also recognise the breadth of support it offers to those wishing to make sustainable investments in Nigeria. However, the picture of multiple focal points and inconsistent policy decisions suggest that there is room for improvement. We heard how changes in Government aid spending had translated to cuts in green infrastructure development investment, putting the UK at a disadvantage. These create yet more uncertainty for investors. To stay competitive and to make rapid progress toward the goals of the Paris agreement, there is scope for the UK Government to streamline its approach: a) We recommend a review of the support of the various DFIs by the Government as well as their methodologies and mandates. Specifically: i) How DFIs can enter the project development process at an earlier stage to provide initial project development funding. ii) How investment risk thresholds for DFIs can be lowered and how to ensure target percentage rates of return can be used to encourage the support of riskier projects. iii) How the time taken to process project proposals can be reduced without compromising due diligence. iv) How the culture of DFIs can be more accessible to the private sector community whilst ensuring positive development outcomes–the desire to maintain a strong link between project outcomes and development outcomes must not present a barrier to the delivery of sustainable projects. b) We recommend that the mandates of enabling UK Government programmes are sufficiently flexible to adjust to the results of feasibility studies and changes in the project design–rather than requiring developers to shift to a different programme; and that investment initiatives which have flexible project funding pots be prioritised.

From: Foreign Affairs Committee, Seventh Report - Lagos calling: Nigeria and the Integrated Review (HC 202), paragraph 42, 29 April 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 13 July 2022 (deadline 29 June 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government partially agrees with the Committee's recommendation on a Nigeria delivery plan, stating that it does "not agree that we should publish a new integrated delivery plan within the next six months".

  • The Government says an internal cross-government strategy already runs to 2023 and that it "will therefore look to refresh" it after the election, and will run a "light touch process" to develop One-HMG country plans "in due course".
  • On the Benin Bronzes and colonial legacy it agrees with the recommendation, noting that museums operate independently of Government and decisions on collections are taken by each institution's trustees.
  • It does not agree to quotas for the Nigerian civil service in skills programming, and does not agree to ring-fence support to human rights projects or British Council programming.
  • It will continue funding the UK-Nigeria Tech Hub for 2022-23, and "potentially" to March 2025, "subject to final ODA allocations".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error