Source · Select Committees · Foreign Affairs Committee
Recommendation 3
3
Accepted
Paragraph: 25
Avoid prioritising Indo-Pacific engagement at the expense of commitments in the Middle East.
Conclusion
While we support a stronger foreign policy focus on the Indo-Pacific region, it should not be achieved at the expense of regions where we have historic and pressing commitments, in particular the Middle East.
Government Response Summary
The government agrees, stating the Integrated Review Refresh already clearly identifies the Middle East as a geographic priority integral to UK interests, confirming existing policy aligns with the committee's view.
Paragraph Reference:
25
Government Response
Accepted
HM Government
Accepted
The Government agrees with the Committee. The Integrated Review Refresh was clear that the Middle East is a geographic priority as part of the Euro-Atlantic wider neighbourhood and integral to the UK’s defence, security, economic, energy and international development interests. The Government supports Israel’s right to defend itself against Hamas in accordance with international humanitarian law and unequivocally condemns Hamas and its appalling acts of terrorism, including the taking of hostages. We are clear that the terrorist actions of Hamas against Israel have no justification. We are working to end the fighting in Gaza – including through regular, high-level engagement with the Israeli government - to stop the further loss of civilian lives and create the conditions for a permanent peace. We are also working with our global partners, including key partners in the region, to prevent the conflict spreading and causing wider instability.