Select committee: Environmental Audit Committee

Conclusion 9

Fourth Report - The UK's contribution to tackling global deforestation Published 4 Jan 2024 Paragraph 38
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Given the scale of government purchasing power, both centrally and across the wider public sector, the UK Government has an opportunity, and a responsibility, to drive best practice and to demand the use of sustainably sourced products.

From: Environmental Audit Committee, Fourth Report - The UK's contribution to tackling global deforestation (HC 405), paragraph 38, 4 January 2024

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 26 March 2024 (deadline 4 March 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government responds to each of the Committee's 22 recommendations, agreeing with some (including on monitoring and on supporting producer countries) while declining to set a footprint target or widen the Government Buying Standards, and setting out its 'legality-based' approach to due diligence.

  • On an environmental footprint target, the government "will not consider setting a target" until it can be certain that it would be supported by a robust evidence base and would not cause unintended consequences such as offshoring of environmental impacts.
  • On monitoring, it "agrees" that tracking the global environmental impacts of UK consumption is important and will "continue to explore" how monitoring, measurement and reporting can be developed. It agrees on mined products, noting the work is in its early stages.
  • On the Environment Act, it declines to prohibit commodities that are legal locally but linked to deforestation, saying it will "uphold and respect national laws". It says it is "committed to laying secondary legislation as soon as parliamentary time allows".
  • On timber, it "plan[s] to commence a review of the Timber Regulations in 2024", with stakeholder engagement details "announced in due course". It is "not currently considering widening the scope" of the Government Buying Standards.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error