Select committee: Environmental Audit Committee

Conclusion 4

First report - Building to net zero: costing carbon in construction Published 26 May 2022 Paragraph 72
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The UK is slipping behind comparator countries in Europe in monitoring and controlling the embodied carbon in construction. If the UK continues to drag its feet on embodied carbon, it will not meet net zero or its carbon budgets. There is significant opportunity for the UK to learn from emerging international best practice on how to introduce whole-life and embodied carbon regulations.

From: Environmental Audit Committee, First report - Building to net zero: costing carbon in construction (HC 103), paragraph 72, 26 May 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 30 September 2022 (deadline 26 July 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees that whole-life carbon assessments are "likely to have a significant role" in decarbonising construction, but it does not commit to mandating them and says it will consult on its approach to embodied carbon in 2023.

  • On a mandatory requirement, it "intends to consult in 2023" and will "consider" what levers, including building regulations, will be needed. It says it is "too soon to commit" to ratcheted carbon targets.
  • It agrees a standardised calculation method is required and "will look at whether" endorsing specific standards, methodologies or tools "is appropriate".
  • It declines to bring forward the Future Homes Standard to 2023, stating it "will not look to alter the timeframe" and that the 2025 timeline delivers on net zero commitments while ensuring homes are delivered in sufficient numbers.
  • On public procurement, it says the Procurement Bill would not be an appropriate place for net zero policy priorities, and that there are "no plans to collect and publish" data on whole-life carbon assessments under the Construction Playbook.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error