Select committee: Environmental Audit Committee

Flooding: Cooperation Across Government inquiry

Closed Opened 18 Jan 2016 Closed 25 Aug 2016
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
Following another winter of severe UK floods, EAC is launching an inquiry into Government policy and action on flooding. We will be focusing on whether the Government’s approach is ‘joined-up’, and the extent to which cooperation across Government on this matter is successful. As part of the inquiry we will be using the resilience of UK infrastructure as a case study. We will use this to investigate issues such as: how Government departments and public bodies can better cooperate to offer coherent policy and action on flooding; what the strengths and weaknesses of the Government’s current approach are; and what is required from Government to ensure that the UK’s development is sustainable and best-placed to face future floods. We are not issuing a formal call for written evidence for this inquiry. However, if you would like to submit evidence relating to cooperation across Government regarding flooding, please contact the Committee team on eacom@parliament.uk .

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 18 January 2016.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently 2nd Report - Flooding: Cooperation across Government on 9 June 2016.

The government's response

Published 9 September 2016.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government welcomes the report but rejects the Committee's conclusion that it has failed to take a long-term approach to flood management, and does not accept the recommendations on infrastructure resilience.

  • On maintenance, the Government says it will protect flood defence maintenance funding in real terms until the end of this Parliament, with an additional £40m per year announced in Budget 2016.
  • On the Committee's call for a 99% asset condition target, the Government says the optimum range is between 96% and 98%, as a higher target would require maintenance to be carried out "very quickly and at substantially increased cost".
  • On infrastructure resilience, it states that it "does not accept the Committee's recommendations" but shares the goal, and says the National Flood Resilience Review will announce further actions agreed with industry.
  • On planning, it does not consider there is "a justified need" for a new systematic approach to checking that homes are built in accordance with planning permission, citing existing enforcement powers.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

4 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
13 Apr 2016
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
24 Feb 2016
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
3 Feb 2016
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
27 Jan 2016
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗