Inquiry into sustainability in the Home Office
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“This inquiry examined the integration of sustainability in the Home Office’s policy approach, governance, and operations, including procurement. It reviews progress against the ‘Greening Government Commitments’, the role of the department’s Sustainability Champion, and its policy approach on Wildlife Crime and crime prevention. Terms of reference: Sustainablility in the Home Office”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
This report assesses the Government’s progress in embedding sustainable development in the Home Office. It follows on from a similar inquiry last year on Sustainability in BIS.
The Home Office appears to be on track to meet the Government’s sustainable operations targets for departments, in part by reducing the size of its estate, but also by effective use of payment-by-result contracts. It has achieved the reductions set for water, paper and waste.
It is making good progress on reducing carbon emissions, despite emissions from travel increasing significantly.
The Home Office uses a ‘CAESER’ tool to highlight sustainability to suppliers and encourage them to improve their performance. The Government should widely adopt this tool for all major suppliers. The Home Office needs to ensure that all contracts include specific sustainability criteria and that performance on these is actively monitored and managed. It should address energy efficiency in its contracts for asylum accommodation.
Crime prevention is an important part of sustainable policing, as it reduces future social and environmental costs. Whilst the Home Office is taking steps to understand the carbon impact of crime, the Government’s policies to remove housing design standards risk less sustainable outcomes. It should ensure that the full environmental and social costs of such decisions are analysed in policy appraisal.
The Government has led international efforts to tackle wildlife crime. It needs to commit long-term funding for these efforts, and further improve the quality of data on recorded and reported offences.
Like BIS, the Home Office has a senior ‘sustainability champion’. All departments should ensure that they have such a post. All staff with sustainability in their job descriptions should undertake the new e-learning sustainability training, and all new civil service staff complete it as part of their induction.
The Home Office should review police procurement spend to introduce new areas for sustainability standards which could be covered by national procurement frameworks. It should also actively explore ways that its procurement can promote wider social impacts.
What the government said
The government responded on 2 December 2014.
The government responds to the ten recommendations of the report on sustainability in the Home Office, setting out where it is taking action, where it says matters rest with others, and where it is awaiting other work before deciding.
- On wildlife crime funding, it notes the additional £544,000 committed over the current spending review period, but says it is "not able to pre-empt the outcome of the next spending review".
- On wildlife law, it agrees the legislation "could be modernised and simplified" and will consider the treatment of wildlife crime offences in light of the Law Commission's final report at the end of the year.
- On sentencing, it says sentences are "a matter solely for the courts", which are independent from Government.
- On procurement, it does not mandate particular tools such as CAESER, as requiring one "could stifle competition". The Home Office will publicise a CSR procurement guide, and work is underway to set sustainability indicators for the COMPASS asylum accommodation contracts.
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 24 March 2014 to its close on 2 December 2014.
- Oral evidence 30 Apr 2014
- Report 12 Sep 2014
- Government response 2 Dec 2014
What it recommended 3 recommendations · 11 conclusions
1As we stated previously, we are concerned that the Government’s current de- regulatory approach on...
2We are pleased by the leadership that the Government has shown to promote international action...
3The Home Office has significantly reduced emissions from its offices, including through reducing the size...
4Carbon emissions from travel have increased significantly in the Home Office in recent years.
5The Home Office undertakes policies and programmes with a range of social and environmental impacts,...
6Long-term action is needed to tackle wildlife crime, and it is important that the Government...
7The Government should keep wildlife crime sentencing under review and be ready to facilitate clear...
8We welcome the steps that the Government has taken around data coding to ensure wildlife...
9The Home Office is making good progress towards achieving the Greening Government Commitment targets.
10The Home Office CAESER tool provides a useful way of engaging suppliers on their sustainability.
11The Home Office should set minimum contractual standards and work with other Government Departments such...
12The Home Office should review police procurement spend to introduce new areas for sustainability standards...
13The role of a senior-level ‘Sustainability Champion’ is important for embedding sustainability and giving organisational...
14It is important that high-quality training material is available to support staff in considering sustainability.
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 1
- 30 Apr 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗