Select committee inquiry

Growing a circular economy

Closed

Environmental Audit Committee · Opened 18 March 2014 · Closed 15 October 2014

8 recommendations · 11 conclusions
Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗

What the inquiry looked at

“In recent years, there has been a growing discussion of resource efficiency, the ‘circular economy’ and the economic and environmental benefits of maximising the value of resources beyond the life of a product. The Environmental Audit Committee examined the issues surrounding building a circular economy. Terms of reference: Growing a circular economy”

The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.

What it found

In the committee's words, from the summary of 3rd Report - Growing a circular economy: Ending the throwaway society ↗

The current way our economy consumes resources is not sustainable. A ‘linear’

approach—where materials are extracted, made into a product, used and discarded—wastes valuable resources and damages the environment. In addition, increasing levels of consumption in developing countries will put ever more pressure on the prices of materials and subsequent costs for businesses and consumers. A ‘circular’ approach of re-using resources, maximising their value over time, makes environmental and economic sense. There are potentially billions of pounds of benefits for businesses across the economy by becoming more resource efficient.

The Government recognises this opportunity, and is involved in a number of initiatives to support a more circular economy, but instead of scaling up its work it is cutting it back. Its approach lacks leadership. The Government should learn from the strategic vision and ambitious targets that other countries have adopted. It should embrace the EU’s ambitious targets for improving resource productivity by 30% and support business in achieving the economic and environmental benefits this would bring. It should also support the European’s Commission’s proposals for recycling and the accompanying targets, and use these to drive change.

During our inquiry, we heard from a range of businesses who are taking steps to a more circular economy approach, such as those that have introduced new business models that sell a service rather than a product or use innovative materials and processes to reduce environmental impacts. They told us that there is a range of barriers that Government should tackle to create the conditions for the changes needed for this to expand. We recommend that the Government reforms taxation and producer responsibility regulations to reward companies that design products with lower environmental impacts and ensures that resources are re-used. Revenues from such an approach should be used to help fund bodies, including WRAP, working to enhance materials recovery and a circular economy. It should also support efforts to improve information about the location of materials and give direct guidance to local authorities on what materials are collected and recycled. This should include a ban on food waste to landfill and separate food waste collections. It should also work with industry to set longer warranty periods for consumer products and new environmental standards for eco-design, taking steps to stop businesses using materials that cannot be recycled when better alternatives exist, and use Government procurement standards to promote a more sustainable and circular economy. The Green Investment Bank too could play a greater part in the circular economy by financing innovative technologies.

What the government said

The government responded on 1 November 2014.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response.

The Government welcomes the report and agrees it is important to continue to move towards a circular economy, while declining or setting limits on several specific recommendations.

  • On differential VAT rates, the Government says that changes would require amendments in EU law and "it would not be possible to reach such agreement"; it considers that "no further reforms to taxation are necessary at this stage".
  • On the PRN scheme, it "welcomes the Committee's recommendation and will consider it as part of current work looking at the PRN system".
  • On food waste, the Government "has no plans to compel councils to adopt household food waste collections", and on ecodesign it has "no plans to require the recyclability of all products coming onto the market".
  • On eDoc, it is "committed to sustaining the eDoc system for the foreseeable future" and will work with industry "to consider whether a mandatory system would be appropriate and beneficial and economically viable".

How the inquiry ran

Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 18 March 2014 to 1 November 2014.

  1. Oral evidence 4 sessions
  2. Report 24 Jul 2014
  3. Government response 1 Nov 2014

What it recommended 8 recommendations · 11 conclusions

1Current taxation laws do not reward companies that take a circular economy approach, with its...
Concluded (the committee's words)
Current taxation laws do not reward companies that take a circular economy approach, with its associated environmental benefits, and risk locking the economy on a linear path. As pressure on resources will continue to increase, taxation policy should incentivise products that are designed to have a lower environmental impact and support greater repair and re-use.
2The current producer responsibility schemes fail to incentivise or reward companies that design products with...
Concluded (the committee's words)
The current producer responsibility schemes fail to incentivise or reward companies that design products with their end-of-life in mind. In addition, aspects of the wider regulatory framework for waste can prevent businesses re- using materials or products.
3A circular economy would be supported by a more consistent national approach to household recycling...
Concluded (the committee's words)
A circular economy would be supported by a more consistent national approach to household recycling collections. This would maximise recycling of a wide range of materials, and ensure consistent messaging and on-pack advice labels on products.
4The ‘Waste Duty of Care’, or ‘eDoc’, is an important initiative to improve the quality...
Concluded (the committee's words)
The ‘Waste Duty of Care’, or ‘eDoc’, is an important initiative to improve the quality of information about the resources contained in waste. It will help businesses and Government better identify opportunities for maximising the value of these materials and plan future investments.
5The Green Investment Bank can play an important role in the transition towards a more...
Concluded (the committee's words)
The Green Investment Bank can play an important role in the transition towards a more circular economy, particularly where infrastructure development for innovative technologies is held back by a lack of finance.
6Re-using products or re-manufacturing components is an efficient way of using existing materials.
Concluded (the committee's words)
Re-using products or re-manufacturing components is an efficient way of using existing materials. There are a variety of barriers that limit their potential, however, including perceptions of the quality of re-used products, and formal acceptance of re-manufacturing as of equal status as new products.
7The Government, through WRAP, has taken some steps to promote a more circular economy through...
Concluded (the committee's words)
The Government, through WRAP, has taken some steps to promote a more circular economy through Government procurement.
8Reducing the dependency on primary resource use for economic growth is an essential part of...
Recommended (the committee's words)
Reducing the dependency on primary resource use for economic growth is an essential part of moving to a more sustainable economic system. Some businesses are showing real leadership and innovation to adjust their business models and become more resource efficient. However, the Government must do more to ensure that the right conditions are in place so that many more businesses shift from a linear approach to a circular one. Targets for resource productivity could provide an important tool for delivering the necessary change by showing businesses that Government is committed to supporting the changes required. The European Commission’s proposals to achieve a 70% recycling target by 2030 could do much to promote innovation. 34 Growing a circular economy: Ending the throwaway society Recommendations
9The Government should introduce differential VAT rates based on life-cycle analysis of the environmental impact...
Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should introduce differential VAT rates based on life-cycle analysis of the environmental impact or recycled content of products, and tax allowances for businesses that repair goods or promote re-use. It should set up a cross-Government working group, led by the Cabinet Office to decide how best to implement such reforms.
10The Government should reform the PRN scheme to include an ‘offset’ or lower charge for...
Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should reform the PRN scheme to include an ‘offset’ or lower charge for products that have higher recycled content and ensure that funds generated from the operation of the scheme are distributed to bodies working to enhance materials recovery and product circularity. It should also introduce individual producer responsibility schemes in new sectors to make more producers design products with their end-of-life in mind. The Government should review how processes for environmental protections against illegal disposal of waste might be simplified to encourage businesses to re-use materials. More generally, it should explore the scope for regulating the minimum recycled content of particular products in order to stimulate sustainable markets in recovered and recycled material.
11Local authorities need to tailor their [household recycling services] to local needs, but the Government...
Recommended (the committee's words)
Local authorities need to tailor their [household recycling services] to local needs, but the Government should give clear guidance that directs local authorities in England towards a more standard approach. This should include separation systems that enable reliable delivery of compatible sorted waste products to all recyclers, separate food waste collections, and a ban on food waste to landfill. (Paragraph 39 )
12The Government should set out plans to ensure eDoc’s long term future so that it...
Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should set out plans to ensure eDoc’s long term future so that it can fulfil its role in improving data quality on waste materials. It should set a deadline by which time reporting in this way will be mandatory.
13The Green Investment Bank should finance innovative technologies to support a circular economy.
Concluded (the committee's words)
The Green Investment Bank should finance innovative technologies to support a circular economy. The Bank could for example showcase the potential of anaerobic digestion plants which are able to process a range of waste feedstock sources by investing in such projects. The Government needs to ensure that its policies for recovering resources and generating energy are aligned and are consistent with the waste hierarchy.
14The Government, working closely with the EU, should establish eco-design standards across a range of...
Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government, working closely with the EU, should establish eco-design standards across a range of products. It should set out the steps towards a ban on products that are made from materials that cannot be recycled, or reduce taxes on those that can be. Such standards would phase out inefficient products or hard to recycle materials by ensuring that companies design products that are consistent with the circular economy, have a clear end-of-life recovery route and are fabricated using easily separable and recyclable components. The Government should underpin voluntary agreements by setting timescales by which regulation would establish the recyclability of all products coming on the market. The Government should also work with industry sectors to set longer minimum warranty periods for consumer products to encourage businesses to adopt more resource-efficient business models.
15[The Government] should take steps to remove trade barriers for remanufactured goods through trade negotiations,...
Concluded (the committee's words)
[The Government] should take steps to remove trade barriers for remanufactured goods through trade negotiations, including pushing for them to be treated in the same way as new products.
16The Government should extend buying standards to include a greater emphasis on the recyclability of...
Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should extend buying standards to include a greater emphasis on the recyclability of materials and recycled or re-used content.
17The Government should learn from the strategic vision and ambitious targets that other countries have...
Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should learn from the strategic vision and ambitious targets that other countries have adopted. It should embrace the EU's ambitious targets for improving resource productivity, and support business in achieving the economic and environmental benefits. It should also support the European's Commission's proposals for recycling and the accompanying proposed targets, and use these to drive change.
18The Government needs to ensure that there is sufficient funding available for agencies such as...
Concluded (the committee's words)
The Government needs to ensure that there is sufficient funding available for agencies such as WRAP and the Technology Strategy Board to support this transition. Some of the revenues from the Landfill Tax and taxes on non-circular products should be used to directly support the circular economy and reverse the cuts in WRAP's funding.
19The circular economy must be embedded into industrial strategy, based on resource risks and covering...
Concluded (the committee's words)
The circular economy must be embedded into industrial strategy, based on resource risks and covering key sectors. Local Enterprise Plans should take identify steps to mitigate these risks and opportunities to innovate. It should also be mainstreamed into departmental business plans, with clear responsibilities for driving this forward in both BIS and Defra and across Government.

Evidence

Oral evidence sessions 4