Growing a circular economy
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“In recent years, there has been a growing discussion of resource efficiency, the ‘circular economy’ and the economic and environmental benefits of maximising the value of resources beyond the life of a product. The Environmental Audit Committee examined the issues surrounding building a circular economy. Terms of reference: Growing a circular economy”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
The current way our economy consumes resources is not sustainable. A ‘linear’
approach—where materials are extracted, made into a product, used and discarded—wastes valuable resources and damages the environment. In addition, increasing levels of consumption in developing countries will put ever more pressure on the prices of materials and subsequent costs for businesses and consumers. A ‘circular’ approach of re-using resources, maximising their value over time, makes environmental and economic sense. There are potentially billions of pounds of benefits for businesses across the economy by becoming more resource efficient.
The Government recognises this opportunity, and is involved in a number of initiatives to support a more circular economy, but instead of scaling up its work it is cutting it back. Its approach lacks leadership. The Government should learn from the strategic vision and ambitious targets that other countries have adopted. It should embrace the EU’s ambitious targets for improving resource productivity by 30% and support business in achieving the economic and environmental benefits this would bring. It should also support the European’s Commission’s proposals for recycling and the accompanying targets, and use these to drive change.
During our inquiry, we heard from a range of businesses who are taking steps to a more circular economy approach, such as those that have introduced new business models that sell a service rather than a product or use innovative materials and processes to reduce environmental impacts. They told us that there is a range of barriers that Government should tackle to create the conditions for the changes needed for this to expand. We recommend that the Government reforms taxation and producer responsibility regulations to reward companies that design products with lower environmental impacts and ensures that resources are re-used. Revenues from such an approach should be used to help fund bodies, including WRAP, working to enhance materials recovery and a circular economy. It should also support efforts to improve information about the location of materials and give direct guidance to local authorities on what materials are collected and recycled. This should include a ban on food waste to landfill and separate food waste collections. It should also work with industry to set longer warranty periods for consumer products and new environmental standards for eco-design, taking steps to stop businesses using materials that cannot be recycled when better alternatives exist, and use Government procurement standards to promote a more sustainable and circular economy. The Green Investment Bank too could play a greater part in the circular economy by financing innovative technologies.
What the government said
The government responded on 1 November 2014.
The Government welcomes the report and agrees it is important to continue to move towards a circular economy, while declining or setting limits on several specific recommendations.
- On differential VAT rates, the Government says that changes would require amendments in EU law and "it would not be possible to reach such agreement"; it considers that "no further reforms to taxation are necessary at this stage".
- On the PRN scheme, it "welcomes the Committee's recommendation and will consider it as part of current work looking at the PRN system".
- On food waste, the Government "has no plans to compel councils to adopt household food waste collections", and on ecodesign it has "no plans to require the recyclability of all products coming onto the market".
- On eDoc, it is "committed to sustaining the eDoc system for the foreseeable future" and will work with industry "to consider whether a mandatory system would be appropriate and beneficial and economically viable".
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 18 March 2014 to 1 November 2014.
- Oral evidence 4 sessions
- Report 24 Jul 2014
- Government response 1 Nov 2014
What it recommended 8 recommendations · 11 conclusions
1Current taxation laws do not reward companies that take a circular economy approach, with its...
2The current producer responsibility schemes fail to incentivise or reward companies that design products with...
3A circular economy would be supported by a more consistent national approach to household recycling...
4The ‘Waste Duty of Care’, or ‘eDoc’, is an important initiative to improve the quality...
5The Green Investment Bank can play an important role in the transition towards a more...
6Re-using products or re-manufacturing components is an efficient way of using existing materials.
7The Government, through WRAP, has taken some steps to promote a more circular economy through...
8Reducing the dependency on primary resource use for economic growth is an essential part of...
9The Government should introduce differential VAT rates based on life-cycle analysis of the environmental impact...
10The Government should reform the PRN scheme to include an ‘offset’ or lower charge for...
11Local authorities need to tailor their [household recycling services] to local needs, but the Government...
12The Government should set out plans to ensure eDoc’s long term future so that it...
13The Green Investment Bank should finance innovative technologies to support a circular economy.
14The Government, working closely with the EU, should establish eco-design standards across a range of...
15[The Government] should take steps to remove trade barriers for remanufactured goods through trade negotiations,...
16The Government should extend buying standards to include a greater emphasis on the recyclability of...
17The Government should learn from the strategic vision and ambitious targets that other countries have...
18The Government needs to ensure that there is sufficient funding available for agencies such as...
19The circular economy must be embedded into industrial strategy, based on resource risks and covering...
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 4
- 2 Jul 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 11 Jun 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 13 May 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 7 May 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗