Select committee: Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee

Conclusion 17

Second Report - Pet welfare and abuse Published 5 Apr 2024 Paragraph 72 Addressed to Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
Conclusion (the committee's words)
A more consistent approach to training and accreditation for animal welfare officers is needed. Existing variations in training and enforcement puts animal welfare at risk. A central unit of suitably trained inspectors should be established which can be utilised by local authorities to improve collaboration and disseminate best practice. Wales has implemented a 5-year animal welfare plan which includes a focus on sharing and developing local authority knowledge and training. The Department should work with counterparts in Welsh Government, and the sector, to assess how similar measures could successfully be embedded in England.

From: Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, Second Report - Pet welfare and abuse (HC 161), paragraph 72, 5 April 2024

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 20 December 2024 (deadline 5 June 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the report and says it is "carefully considering" the recommendations, partially accepting several, rejecting one on penalties for illegal veterinary surgery, and setting out no plans to change some import and border controls "at this time".

  • On the dog litter licensing threshold, it "partially accepts" the recommendation but says reducing it "may result in unintended consequences", and is considering the threshold and scope in its post-implementation review of the LAIA Regulations.
  • On puppy smuggling and mutilated imports, it "partially accepts" the recommendation and is "fully supportive" of the Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill, a Private Members' Bill, wanting it to pass "as soon as Parliamentary time allows".
  • It "rejects" the recommendation on fines for illegal veterinary surgery, saying existing penalties are higher than suggested in evidence provided to the Committee.
  • On rabies testing, it has "no plans to introduce these requirements at this time", and says its future policy "will be guided by risk assessment".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error