Select committee inquiry

Dog Control and Welfare

Closed

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee · Opened 13 April 2012 · Closed 17 April 2012

Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗

What the inquiry looked at

“The Committee’s inquiry included consideration of the measures on Tackling Irresponsible Dog Ownership announced for consultation by Defra on 23 April and the response by Government and dog breeders to Professor Bateson’s Independent Inquiry into Dog Breeding. Dog Control and Welfare - publication of Report Further information including details of Report and evidence taken”

The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.

What it found

In the committee's words, from the summary of 7th Report - Dog Control and Welfare ↗

The UK is said to be a nation of dog lovers, with some 8 million canine pets—yet over 100,000 strays are found each year, incidences of cruelty and neglect are rising and many dogs are out of control due to the irresponsible or deliberate actions of a minority of owners. Seven people, including five children, have been killed by dogs in homes since 2007 and the cost to the NHS of treating severe dog attack injuries is over £3 million annually. Additionally, many animals, including livestock and some eight assistance dogs a month, are attacked by dogs.

Current dangerous dogs laws have comprehensively failed to tackle irresponsible dog ownership and Defra’s current, belated proposals are woefully inadequate. Ministers’

inability to provide us with detailed answers on a range of dog control and welfare questions has done little to reassure us about the priority the Government gives to these issues. Defra should urgently introduce a comprehensive Bill consolidating the fragmented legislation relating to dog control and welfare. This should include tailored Dog Control Notices which would allow enforcement officers more effectively to prevent dog attacks by enabling action on any dog-related antisocial behaviour. Failing this, Defra must be given a much firmer locus in policy-making so that dog-related issues can be fully taken into account in the Home Office current proposals for a ‘one size fits all’ set of antisocial behaviour prevention measures. The Government’s simplistic approach ignores the real cause of antisocial behaviour related to dogs. Irresponsible dog breeding and the failure to socialise puppies in the first few months of life can lead to persistent problems which are hard to tackle later on. The current Home Office approach appears to focus solely on the current owner of a dog rather than the initial breeder and this cannot begin to tackle the scale of the problem.

Local authorities must ensure that dog warden services are fully resourced so as to more effectively manage stray dogs: failing this the Government should consider returning statutory responsibility for stray dogs to the police.

There is a gap in the current law on dog attacks which means that those attacked on private property have no recourse to the criminal law provisions which apply to attacks on public land. We fully endorse the Government’s proposed amendment to the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 to encompass attacks on private land but it will be crucial, in enforcing this, that the police and prosecutors distinguish between those lawfully on a person’s property and intruders. The Government’s assurances on this are too vague and clear guidance is needed to avoid unintended consequences.

Dog attacks on animals are not given sufficient attention in the current legal framework.

Attacks on assistance dogs such as guide dogs can have severe impacts on a disabled person’s mobility and daily life. Legislation should be amended so that an attack by a dog on an assistance dog is treated as an aggravated attack in the same manner as an attack on a person.

The police must be more consistent in prosecuting those whose dogs attack livestock and existing legislation must be updated to include livestock such as llamas and other camelids.

What the government said

7th Report - Dog Control and Welfare

No government response is linked to this report.

7th Report - Dog Control and Welfare - Volume II (Additional Evidence)

No government response is linked to this report.

How the inquiry ran

Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 13 April 2012 to 15 February 2013.

  1. Report 2 reports

What it recommended

The committee's recommendations are not listed here yet. Read them in 7th Report - Dog Control and Welfare ↗ and 7th Report - Dog Control and Welfare - Volume II (Additional Evidence) ↗ on parliament.uk.