Select committee: Energy Security and Net Zero Committee

Conclusion 12

1st Report - Retrofitting homes for net zero Published 22 May 2025 Addressed to Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Electricity is much more expensive than gas in the UK because gas generation sets the marginal wholesale price and most levies are placed on electricity bills, rather than gas. This is a significant disincentive for consumers switching from fossil fuel to electric heating and a major barrier to decarbonising homes. Lowering the price of electricity relative to gas has been the tipping point needed to encourage the mass uptake of low carbon heating systems in some European countries. (Conclusion, Paragraph 90)

From: Energy Security and Net Zero Committee, 1st Report - Retrofitting homes for net zero (HC 453), 22 May 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 18 August 2025 (deadline 22 July 2025).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response sets out much of its position through the forthcoming Warm Homes Plan, recognising several of the Committee's concerns while giving a longer timeline on gas network work and expressing scepticism on one funding proposal.

  • On long-term retrofit support, the government states that £13.2 billion "has been committed" to the Warm Homes Plan over 2025/26 to 2029/30, with allocations for individual programmes to be set out "by October this year".
  • On Energy Performance Certificates, the government is reforming them and "expects" changes to the metrics to be introduced in 2026; it will publish its consultation response "in due course".
  • On repurposing the gas network, the department "anticipates a longer timeline to be needed than the Committee's recommendation" and will publish a Call for Evidence in 2026.
  • On the Heat Training Grant, the government says it is "sceptical about plans to compensate installers for lost earnings", citing the complexity of avoiding "risks of fraud".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error